Re: [Webpush] Application server authentication new years edition

Benjamin Bangert <bbangert@mozilla.com> Thu, 07 January 2016 16:59 UTC

Return-Path: <bbangert@mozilla.com>
X-Original-To: webpush@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: webpush@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC2531A90D1 for <webpush@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Jan 2016 08:59:21 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.278
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.278 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xk56CmGPmP4A for <webpush@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Jan 2016 08:59:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qk0-x22f.google.com (mail-qk0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CB4FF1A90CC for <webpush@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Jan 2016 08:59:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qk0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id p186so106962015qke.0 for <webpush@ietf.org>; Thu, 07 Jan 2016 08:59:18 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mozilla-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=nwqOGlvUg1paf9uor+86pT+3STefSonFO2VmxOrAuao=; b=rwxX0ruxvyjeJRVwEt1ZixBcF40E9SF46UqS54N0ELlpIxIfAXBGgIif2lylglhqRD lDmVU8+x900ljcXB47p4oZu0FvKQNEWfdpH4Jgap/xvw/Hup2AU/PLlEHEOcz3tSbUlD Db7u2/i3+7vwSSRfUzjAd1iBIsM6rKSts+gB6mXtsJow0qcS6cRbuWJMGbz0CzSNrM8n fwKEC36RjYo5qav9oBLg6Tu8XO/GHDbzMt4mj0hj56383MU/UrAm3sqtK9ytv+Ukebb6 43UPZ/V178+bT+YJQRJi5sYzt0YUWht6MeOutGTX8CyVJ+e3kBgQfwTbySaYfgj9ppFc gcjQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=nwqOGlvUg1paf9uor+86pT+3STefSonFO2VmxOrAuao=; b=gS/oDIxImHQA57hj28A6Cj92wOPnQv6hZXqd9IZ3hRham5m0PUnkPgTQEIw0r/egnD RmSGmC3XcXNczyaQspzqrTp+wqq+0sfzldCE8PJ2EKh3sIxnr5oRXprrPjDNZIxjFdDB MPaKSbbGDyUQytCj+sBVvZBxuhwRoslC9GqpEQ6gKdbI57Pxtjq2YrR+d569GkUaT81X wQovtesLUvjQsfiwooqaXMsYe0dnQ6cfK6hPNbc5KyTj/GHUaXmC1ZDfExuEKhrFaczR LJmZ8iTr23ENw9UQX01Pb7ASs+OkDUG7apIjW0Afj/4aE7ymCGpMiBo2SzVidCmxEjD9 13BQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmzra6H7XPPIvOMhCSRSkxUqCu8EBF/TZ/Gq1YlYINoxveqGJJ5MeCI8la2yOpXggxl0hwxr7m4WiEO2UvByUBbfodg5DNrCUiaiA/nsUWdG98pjbQ=
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.13.250.196 with SMTP id k187mr90558405ywf.23.1452185957811; Thu, 07 Jan 2016 08:59:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.37.224.9 with HTTP; Thu, 7 Jan 2016 08:59:17 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CABkgnnW7oRTZRKDQcxf9=0f-mxKfctQQTrR5zY6q4qJtL_cPjw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABkgnnXBHXfY6Gz-FKGVUUoOwyJo9zaw1rWceSqVp94FypDbJA@mail.gmail.com> <CAP8-Fq=PhUcj5aaE6dvF2_+-HmVrGDyk41QBzkVxiNMxUakoag@mail.gmail.com> <CABkgnnUYkuu9pjuqLDhiWLNWzkr9ZfYRNny4ZvSKRTWie2bQyA@mail.gmail.com> <CAP8-FqnSqtMb5bT14tkycYXOOP+Xmoa9SMjuP5KkeN_ri+_NVQ@mail.gmail.com> <CABkgnnU0CP-fGpEfqLo01ZVdjT3dNVeb3MSufO1P8T2W63dNVw@mail.gmail.com> <CAP8-FqkF9X+_CjSyXB10621L0=b756REjXsbRfsL8rT6nuh9pw@mail.gmail.com> <CABkgnnW7oRTZRKDQcxf9=0f-mxKfctQQTrR5zY6q4qJtL_cPjw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2016 08:59:17 -0800
Message-ID: <CABp8EuJ9gd4ZrjP+AGF2+=BQUndHeppkoO2ji38+76kiZ6B+qg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Benjamin Bangert <bbangert@mozilla.com>
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=94eb2c05ed502a057d0528c164bc
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/webpush/lauS-SwyelkObJuOQ9aXKsAQb6c>
Cc: Costin Manolache <costin@gmail.com>, Costin Manolache <costin@google.com>, "webpush@ietf.org" <webpush@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Webpush] Application server authentication new years edition
X-BeenThere: webpush@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of potential IETF work on a web push protocol <webpush.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/webpush>, <mailto:webpush-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/webpush/>
List-Post: <mailto:webpush@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:webpush-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/webpush>, <mailto:webpush-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Jan 2016 16:59:21 -0000

2.3 sounds fine.

I'm curious what thoughts there are around charging providers, but that can
wait for a separate thread.

On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 11:53 PM, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>;
wrote:

> On 7 January 2016 at 16:43, Costin Manolache <costin@gmail.com>; wrote:
> > That leaves 2.3 only.
>
> It looks like we're mostly in agreement for something like 2.3.
> Should I take some time and flesh out the details?  Does anyone
> disagree?
>