IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Webpush] WGLC for draft-ietf-webpush-protocol (again)

jr conlin <jconlin@mozilla.com> Thu, 23 June 2016 16:23 UTC

Return-Path: <jconlin@mozilla.com>
X-Original-To: webpush@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: webpush@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE9DE12B037 for <webpush@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Jun 2016 09:23:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mozilla-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id O3AyFJIVJPdt for <webpush@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Jun 2016 09:23:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oi0-x22b.google.com (mail-oi0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B02C312B00F for <webpush@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Jun 2016 09:23:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oi0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id u201so77803411oie.0 for <webpush@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Jun 2016 09:23:10 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mozilla-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to; bh=UQi2/7qLqaqklBIiJuScGOVNvpCue8NouK56AVPhchg=; b=fg0cNb6L74wF2nf4HaZOINlU0aTz4TGCf1M5K3DAU0uSzWmjDZ7jmeG6E0AW/xc/z8 SQzlDRvj1qVsmL0SW87ECSuv6LScdZS5Ofj5XY8S0BMZOCZ+ML+/Qsfbr3+dCcdxRKP0 QaoHPvvJNBcdW51SUcUfPwPpsyccuN9LdUy3g9iLkGmhtNL79qCKGWg2mVsPgcbEfK/S KV8H1URfgc8ZRfZFsNqtwtecezGFNgKHorwzq+xY3Z8PMlbdYaiHDQc1YDc9MtUKmHuh GL0DO6MdFaHWEl+RjidyYW9UE2Y0ecBt7nKydKSVugROMyI42a31vDo4xmQVteTP/2ze E5ww==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=UQi2/7qLqaqklBIiJuScGOVNvpCue8NouK56AVPhchg=; b=l18oCji69YG3YlFg4b1jyHDXk+wjH+xmMDO15A6HlQCLCk4EBNGNFOxXoUKraglBz2 gTeH33vWjLSyv04ajhXLQc1XrgsadbRdEaGig72GLYhoULzv3dmbb3xZMIpBm6galkK2 R3LY8ZD7L4t1CUV5moTsoZ8t06sawUcFK7HKouCGzBDgZXbVOZ8RIt0kIfGkHgM7jRKt 9La6AFKUs7YAblJE1itUwj88AdyDwIZPTJPbmp3hayQ131Jdl5Z9tVm85fmV7DUI2FVE VQK7x1ZDSS29Lyg81deenRsIAPQj0tzMw27LdJmksQTxill04dN0rmoD5lFC51DnhGyH 1DvQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tL/vg1CTkTf+H7T1tEMVj7ETd6eedw+UAF9HHrFRcDcb03wOD6IOc+3I5+ffPp0jrLj
X-Received: by 10.157.8.65 with SMTP id 59mr7467060oty.114.1466698989943; Thu, 23 Jun 2016 09:23:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2602:306:b826:64df:76:b75b:9151:7780? ([2602:306:b826:64df:76:b75b:9151:7780]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y3sm443572ota.18.2016.06.23.09.23.09 for <webpush@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 23 Jun 2016 09:23:09 -0700 (PDT)
To: webpush@ietf.org
References: <E7305E31-07A2-4B84-AA90-635AB97E46DF@ntt-at.com>
From: jr conlin <jconlin@mozilla.com>
Message-ID: <fee55fa2-fbdf-b63e-7acb-b0b429deb0ff@mozilla.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2016 09:23:10 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:49.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/49.0a2
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <E7305E31-07A2-4B84-AA90-635AB97E46DF@ntt-at.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------1D4C923F87D860F7B10A1C27"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/webpush/o2xAg5pASPCAvrE4mUELFa5A0EY>
Subject: Re: [Webpush] WGLC for draft-ietf-webpush-protocol (again)
X-BeenThere: webpush@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of potential IETF work on a web push protocol <webpush.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/webpush>, <mailto:webpush-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/webpush/>
List-Post: <mailto:webpush@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:webpush-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/webpush>, <mailto:webpush-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2016 16:23:14 -0000

I have no additional concerns or requests for this protocol, and support
this draft.

Huge thanks to the editors and contributors for their patience and
understanding.

On 6/23/2016 12:58 AM, Shida Schubert wrote:
> All;
>
> As I noted on the e-mail I sent out on June 7th after the initial WGLC
> for webpush protocol draft, we are commencing another WGLC as there
> are no remaining issues on github AND the authors have produced the 06
> version of the draft reflecting all resolutions.
>
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-webpush-protocol-06
>
> If you have any issues or questions regarding the draft please submit
> it to the list, when raising issues please provide constructive
> resolution whenever possible.
>
> PLEASE acknowledge on the list when you are content/happy with the
> status of the draft and you see no issue passing it forward to IESG
> for publication. 
>
> The WGLC will conclude at the end of the day on July 8th PST.
>
> Shida
> As co-chair
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Webpush mailing list
> Webpush@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/webpush

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email