IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Webpush] Non-blocking comments on -05

Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Wed, 01 June 2016 12:56 UTC

Return-Path: <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: webpush@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: webpush@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0EB012D1B6 for <webpush@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Jun 2016 05:56:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4WNSZSuooEso for <webpush@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Jun 2016 05:56:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qg0-x235.google.com (mail-qg0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c04::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0707412D1AF for <webpush@ietf.org>; Wed, 1 Jun 2016 05:56:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qg0-x235.google.com with SMTP id p34so37163742qgp.1 for <webpush@ietf.org>; Wed, 01 Jun 2016 05:56:49 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc; bh=/gZlkAcXKFslIW3eO4f2MNwyFD9tsWz/a/97YLVgwKA=; b=cLNA55N4d2sW+QBrZ5Q37xpBvHIzd5oOyvzJUvrFtmMqCo6p9qySIs7S32JrZIsO5M rZ5wTBCcTed4eWNWh869l/VbDrrgb7gpuQIISjRoQABWDCy9goGzmw4TNDcOLriqNxhI AR5xjr4Z0MSaPOmi5ZreEmOhcolYlN/VIYFbFSple8aezS5aiAMXmoPf9oZohzFQ0CBb 3aR53yKJG+Kv0dhlP9oFb8HryGG5SuJGx8HySy5gK7+V4B+9cFiM94DcJItcKHnnh9QY DLkqIaXvAAgqQHqJNiYGzP7zrPK1oILybn95y5amK2um6Wsg5/W3ubKJDV0TI4vsOsqy TDLQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc; bh=/gZlkAcXKFslIW3eO4f2MNwyFD9tsWz/a/97YLVgwKA=; b=UXuqY9ZkmLorLgHfyeQHmYSoyQvCHq3NezpC11QL0XT0ebjkvdNjU3lGv6kviXt7nB EK+j9VS/BxMiN1+05/7/fqfVhrOl7PvyJJuoR33txEzRQSHONVQP++HN69Xu1xIajEtv cjvsNNWYwrEuq78fVnhOyGjH/2p9pBMMwbwBRaxgETr5kj1mHQjvzHKNnHoKYnWeIIIU 2swb2wOuUNss+PjsMfMV3ufZUU/4AFxeGL8Gse2IA7rkdMpIBQ6gDu/eh5+QLOhPvcLM 2GvZGAwnZIUC7qr9qYFJpa6w7yu6hx68yISUdJ/Ut/WsDXkPlNwuC6f3LyzISfshr6oS 5SEw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tIRne39pesH+xJzYRgJS3vCkdysaE8L00Mwl2egqpw5DwwfiIG1XvfMjc2dJD5Z/0NIjqPjkeRA+4aR2g==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.140.253.85 with SMTP id y82mr34344974qhc.94.1464785809174; Wed, 01 Jun 2016 05:56:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.140.104.110 with HTTP; Wed, 1 Jun 2016 05:56:49 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CO2PR03MB240753E779A28BD536187CE783470@CO2PR03MB2407.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
References: <CALt3x6=_yc9TegOut_g+6W5fvhP7sfW+_gwRZnEVFA5PNgER6Q@mail.gmail.com> <CABkgnnUn7NSrh_vpEhezaBDCxWkt3fdnw8KxHjRtAH=23Hat-A@mail.gmail.com> <CO2PR03MB240753E779A28BD536187CE783470@CO2PR03MB2407.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2016 22:56:49 +1000
Message-ID: <CABkgnnX_HSuyX1TXt49CBvi062vpVXG_Xc4eCF4E52w8EYs3Gw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
To: Brian Raymor <Brian.Raymor@microsoft.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/webpush/oFM61ROWS5iBpxSXbA88FHyUT0A>
Cc: "webpush@ietf.org" <webpush@ietf.org>, Peter Beverloo <beverloo@google.com>
Subject: Re: [Webpush] Non-blocking comments on -05
X-BeenThere: webpush@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of potential IETF work on a web push protocol <webpush.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/webpush>, <mailto:webpush-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/webpush/>
List-Post: <mailto:webpush@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:webpush-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/webpush>, <mailto:webpush-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2016 12:56:52 -0000

On 1 June 2016 at 13:42, Brian Raymor <Brian.Raymor@microsoft.com> wrote:
> There was some early discussion in https://github.com/webpush-wg/webpush-protocol/issues/24.
>
> There were no major objections at the time. It just felt odd to have a special case for TTL=0 in comparison to TTL=1.

That's right, I remember now.  Costin has said as much on the PR that
I generated.  If Peter is OK with this explanation, I will just close
the PR.

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email