Re: [Webpush] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-webpush-vapid-03
Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Tue, 04 July 2017 00:25 UTC
Return-Path: <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: webpush@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: webpush@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8F4E13181B; Mon, 3 Jul 2017 17:25:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3t2UMHmqy5uI; Mon, 3 Jul 2017 17:25:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf0-x231.google.com (mail-lf0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F16E0131814; Mon, 3 Jul 2017 17:25:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf0-x231.google.com with SMTP id b207so110140455lfg.2; Mon, 03 Jul 2017 17:25:03 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=wLztgpu0/8eTvKnxPAhVAwWpPckYX8N5LsjBQKIOT9A=; b=EJ54BPlgin4ePYYYl7G5pRZ2GDUFRbtXJvxhD3WWhRL9+uLiRmG0TnRr9/NRJw72hS b9I6k13G2nPKkuvElJ3m/0RUyykKbpW1acBHThxzXfM+YQ91IPnoHraXA1kAQnqu0KQx RCqEAenyBC6zlXTR5vPmATqfQJyinre3jFr7qT9V5EdwHALLg1Dewcspnc7LptH08nnL 3FcjXJtxzuac0WqTjdXHVD3ERXBUged1PolLa4R4l32or7k/H7dEGmNNobXQlh/TkpDt DE7zC1bX3j9NvbY0PuPjfele4IbyiaXP9SV2thbLjcWDWQOvMY+XrpffU8RjZ3QFZ/vX yWtA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=wLztgpu0/8eTvKnxPAhVAwWpPckYX8N5LsjBQKIOT9A=; b=DJcyk6NTDwXgB8hhJu46WkY0VdLgyHB/G40bVIbTLzILdoU6/qnr93E/pimuEuKgCG arouiUsepA1h9Fhz2KACBb8MVewrehnESgepFpk7yQPe0eiKO6lEpZupDwY8EHo2p/g5 xU/LfTFt96tJe+YZvI5cxQOJ5RN2SPdBRk/ZH+Toy6doOShSX1DzuW3+gqnF7OljuGk7 3QeB+wjATT9xN80+BU9bJMHO0sqQFK6cD/BHs5Nabk95GP3eCy90O3e0DZMoDUsWaPhM 5wUuW+vNVgPNQYbXzl0/m0kz2u0cf2uVF9GkDONYu/Rd81Rq/Mn0X1uuGdmRPk9d5KSB /e8A==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKS2vOw8qBBHoX57I1MJ1WzYmoDXXj0LKXl5G4X34vixyZvKgNXG4iK+ qZy6f5MWXwkANMsFzrlrzdpRSr1wFQ==
X-Received: by 10.46.77.70 with SMTP id a67mr11843344ljb.103.1499127902275; Mon, 03 Jul 2017 17:25:02 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.46.69.84 with HTTP; Mon, 3 Jul 2017 17:25:01 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <93C3F14F-A6B9-4682-9173-7BE10D1A8EA2@tzi.org>
References: <149909744835.22804.5791695515985213782@ietfa.amsl.com> <bb3631d2-f5b5-d6b0-958f-ac9c10aaddec@nostrum.com> <CABkgnnUXMiMYYvmT2tV3=V_J3JGc2Cqvyo0R30nY27vL52t7eA@mail.gmail.com> <93C3F14F-A6B9-4682-9173-7BE10D1A8EA2@tzi.org>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 04 Jul 2017 10:25:01 +1000
Message-ID: <CABkgnnWvQHPe0VPjZq372NisukW3aOuk6wv+EK43r+d67RQe2w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
Cc: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>, Stefan Winter <stefan.winter@restena.lu>, "ops-dir@ietf.org" <ops-dir@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-webpush-vapid.all@ietf.org, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>, "webpush@ietf.org" <webpush@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/webpush/plD_nz0Mz1jAxGG98OB14gKR_wU>
Subject: Re: [Webpush] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-webpush-vapid-03
X-BeenThere: webpush@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of potential IETF work on a web push protocol <webpush.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/webpush>, <mailto:webpush-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/webpush/>
List-Post: <mailto:webpush@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:webpush-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/webpush>, <mailto:webpush-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Jul 2017 00:25:12 -0000
On 4 July 2017 at 10:20, Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> wrote: > base64 classic seems to need padding and reacts differently on different versions when that is missing. Ahh, another example of insufficient application of Postel's Maxim. Adding "=" fixes this particular problem.
- [Webpush] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-w… Stefan Winter
- Re: [Webpush] Opsdir last call review of draft-ie… Adam Roach
- Re: [Webpush] Opsdir last call review of draft-ie… Martin Thomson
- Re: [Webpush] Opsdir last call review of draft-ie… Carsten Bormann
- Re: [Webpush] Opsdir last call review of draft-ie… Martin Thomson
- Re: [Webpush] Opsdir last call review of draft-ie… Martin Thomson