Re: [Webpush] Different status codes for negative Push Message Receipts
Brian Raymor <Brian.Raymor@microsoft.com> Tue, 07 June 2016 23:19 UTC
Return-Path: <Brian.Raymor@microsoft.com>
X-Original-To: webpush@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: webpush@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6769612D812
for <webpush@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Jun 2016 16:19:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.002
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.002 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001,
SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
header.d=microsoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 5D1j0vts9Jp9 for <webpush@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Tue, 7 Jun 2016 16:19:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from na01-bn1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com
(mail-bn1on0747.outbound.protection.outlook.com
[IPv6:2a01:111:f400:fc10::747])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 839C912D18E
for <webpush@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Jun 2016 16:18:23 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com;
s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version;
bh=sCZBG8QdkH1tOQg1xfrSsphVnAyfyMqrq0FR8qbZH6o=;
b=L6l50XNgVP7u+YJRciQUT6GjbFZ8OBAiEWNLzsQfjDNOlBpEgRCqW9xLPk1dsR23y7wD8nP/buqSufccINMYapdn6S7uN7knKufCobWC5QQXorUn3dVi6+nqaTC+YqfZnZ7+R7ID+eaDj7CzIMOunAC7WM8eXXt+RIp0Qu62SaM=
Received: from BN3PR03MB2403.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.166.75.14) by
BN3PR03MB2402.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.166.75.13) with Microsoft SMTP
Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P384) id
15.1.511.8; Tue, 7 Jun 2016 23:15:10 +0000
Received: from BN3PR03MB2403.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ([10.166.75.14]) by
BN3PR03MB2403.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ([10.166.75.14]) with mapi id
15.01.0511.010; Tue, 7 Jun 2016 23:15:09 +0000
From: Brian Raymor <Brian.Raymor@microsoft.com>
To: Idel Pivnitskiy <idel.pivnitskiy@gmail.com>, "webpush@ietf.org"
<webpush@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Webpush] Different status codes for negative Push Message
Receipts
Thread-Index: AQHRwEa5vUhTLLwUUEWQzOHJmCGu/Z/eo8Fg
Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2016 23:15:09 +0000
Message-ID: <BN3PR03MB2403FF7DAF6F11A6EA8FD2A4835D0@BN3PR03MB2403.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
References: <CAN+BUJpZCHsAbf+6GOatOdw6Mq4R2asrKVjiOpivavCANLYMsA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAN+BUJpZCHsAbf+6GOatOdw6Mq4R2asrKVjiOpivavCANLYMsA@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is )
smtp.mailfrom=Brian.Raymor@microsoft.com;
x-originating-ip: [24.16.23.27]
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 7a8ef54e-a2d3-4ccd-fcff-08d38f29923e
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; BN3PR03MB2402;
5:n1mmkmCG+uEXwaXinqJNItN+h/jTM569CIaGhJ3/qfOZPaPGy5iJbUSyifqnD05iR/slKHuxPdi86fTQE+O/HhOraTxNlR1AMmU7sGxUtSE3C/30vQu2Ql9bEo/gGBapwMssNA3PqBm2QbzGmpJCmQ==;
24:+nmzxjIRosuQGEeCKUlWdMlnOH/9UHTYA/WO5Tjc9fsVXZDFpYg4qu6yGdpTxQrSge33zdXeEXIn96tWb57IegQ4gz1zmeeH1dVCvOwHa+A=;
7:slvsHdR+Q9N4s8ljTWhpmqKiNe4Ey6aFWotSbO4wETu46/Ef9T8B5rHAz+0OkyFTXxMmqjE6hhnVOMEC13Y82uC+WoN9QEeJIjZxpOxy4/WNFaLspd5m/qkUVbOJdyAJKv7eHL9UzaHzy/7k3akz90cp1HhDR0xy5etInlQX3tharbuHjZlKA1ChkP8D5l79A8bxtOjELdI8qtwdz+2BesRf2m5kO+p9k/Ahvpa6gLPFMmAWfvxPfW1JwdrRb+0p
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:BN3PR03MB2402;
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BN3PR03MB240233EF9933D63FE01B1BE6835D0@BN3PR03MB2402.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(166708455590820);
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0;
RULEID:(61425038)(601004)(2401047)(8121501046)(5005006)(10201501046)(3002001)(6055026)(61426038)(61427038);
SRVR:BN3PR03MB2402; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:BN3PR03MB2402;
x-forefront-prvs: 09669DB681
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM;
SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(12063002)(199003)(189002)(24454002)(377454003)(5008740100001)(68736007)(99286002)(5001770100001)(2501003)(8936002)(2906002)(106116001)(87936001)(97736004)(10400500002)(8990500004)(6116002)(3280700002)(5005710100001)(33656002)(10290500002)(105586002)(3846002)(76576001)(122556002)(5004730100002)(102836003)(106356001)(86612001)(5002640100001)(107886002)(10090500001)(77096005)(86362001)(54356999)(586003)(50986999)(76176999)(2950100001)(15650500001)(5003600100002)(3660700001)(189998001)(101416001)(66066001)(19580395003)(15975445007)(19580405001)(81166006)(81156014)(74316001)(8676002)(92566002)(2900100001)(9686002);
DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:BN3PR03MB2402;
H:BN3PR03MB2403.namprd03.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords;
A:1; MX:1; LANG:en;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: microsoft.com does not designate
permitted sender hosts)
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: microsoft.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 07 Jun 2016 23:15:09.7842 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 72f988bf-86f1-41af-91ab-2d7cd011db47
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BN3PR03MB2402
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/webpush/rO-NQ07a0DreSNovGSpJqrFP_ag>
Subject: Re: [Webpush] Different status codes for negative Push Message
Receipts
X-BeenThere: webpush@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of potential IETF work on a web push protocol
<webpush.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/webpush>,
<mailto:webpush-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/webpush/>
List-Post: <mailto:webpush@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:webpush-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/webpush>,
<mailto:webpush-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2016 23:19:16 -0000
On Monday, June 6, 2016 3:56 PM, Idel Pivnitskiy <idel.pivnitskiy@gmail.com> wrote: > I've created an issue on GitHub, related to this discussion: > https://github.com/webpush-wg/webpush-protocol/issues/110 > Could be useful for an AS to know what happened with push message / UA. I’ve added my comments to the issue. Thanks, ...Brian
- [Webpush] Different status codes for negative Pus… Idel Pivnitskiy
- Re: [Webpush] Different status codes for negative… Brian Raymor
- Re: [Webpush] Different status codes for negative… Benjamin Bangert
- Re: [Webpush] Different status codes for negative… Brian Raymor
- Re: [Webpush] Different status codes for negative… Brian Raymor