IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Webpush] Require the TTL header

Brian Raymor <Brian.Raymor@microsoft.com> Fri, 05 February 2016 16:26 UTC

Return-Path: <Brian.Raymor@microsoft.com>
X-Original-To: webpush@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: webpush@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FBBA1B3B2A for <webpush@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Feb 2016 08:26:55 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.876
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.876 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, HTTP_ESCAPED_HOST=1.125, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FGFKjroFOt0a for <webpush@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Feb 2016 08:26:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from na01-bn1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bn1bon0771.outbound.protection.outlook.com [IPv6:2a01:111:f400:fc10::1:771]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8D18B1B3B29 for <webpush@ietf.org>; Fri, 5 Feb 2016 08:26:52 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=selector1; h=From:To:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=wK76w4usqZrKgJNmcIKFXaKyuXQ9dqUyNK187NR1/0Q=; b=O73J7F4s6R7f3edb1SdjaswjHO1o6JxB1NrkTcZNdelvyQd9Ek4xFNlGu1Va397mDusUL94gytQdeklTHDkZLNxePMQ8WoxEArQBLk5GByTPPHve0kcg1h8LHR62fuRzqq5PnmZndD6B8yWmkjnZoGB2PW5BR9tXlP+ml7iBVLw=
Received: from BY2PR0301MB0647.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.160.63.14) by BY2PR0301MB0645.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.160.63.13) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.396.15; Fri, 5 Feb 2016 16:26:34 +0000
Received: from BY2PR0301MB0647.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ([10.160.63.14]) by BY2PR0301MB0647.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ([10.160.63.14]) with mapi id 15.01.0403.016; Fri, 5 Feb 2016 16:26:34 +0000
From: Brian Raymor <Brian.Raymor@microsoft.com>
To: Miguel Garcia <miguelg@chromium.org>, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: [Webpush] Require the TTL header
Thread-Index: AQHRX7qxmPHR5E4P70WaFLGI8LoOcp8c4q4AgABt5oCAAAF6AIAAUj4Q
Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2016 16:26:34 +0000
Message-ID: <BY2PR0301MB06471B81A391EBBFCEEC29CF83D20@BY2PR0301MB0647.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
References: <CABp8Eu+oBj8XKWbqd9ypT_mQWzMxXDe+cBR_vqk=rJ=6tM3tFA@mail.gmail.com> <BY2PR0301MB06477C93FA8937F0ABD4393383D20@BY2PR0301MB0647.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> <CABkgnnWmfBVPMhCoSJ14B2yrGh7ieNH04_oR6XgpEkFv0RuVvA@mail.gmail.com> <CAGTrua0+=5WzyVP9KuG6v5Jrt4Q6FRDXo1xgRs753cdVW-yTEQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAGTrua0+=5WzyVP9KuG6v5Jrt4Q6FRDXo1xgRs753cdVW-yTEQ@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: chromium.org; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none; chromium.org; dmarc=none action=none header.from=microsoft.com;
x-originating-ip: [2601:600:8000:5a8:c5c7:6c53:91d6:3b]
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 41c0c42c-8f15-415c-4c0c-08d32e491d34
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; BY2PR0301MB0645; 5:XjBTVc9i8AEZ2pINtOG/tdE4R43F505N250d0aocIy6SpDzQylMyrUfAMyKsnnLpSMl58vkz5eXPwvoLC3JrSjMfs/3tvDQoHfjRPFnb5dMK4TzdT+JD74u4tfhERmFwxkz8sM3gsEu5LAwmcPy3Zw==; 24:PkaNjZFZE/FanNXTK9ghp9fm0sLKt7TOVtHEdhXZL07ItdSldi53ER+mIC83+5XZdunFRmeMt7PKAIQiI+/P2ujDX9zj+oThsh6M1QZHrfM=
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:BY2PR0301MB0645;
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BY2PR0301MB0645D1520FEDA28D23D6E03583D20@BY2PR0301MB0645.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:;
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(61425038)(601004)(2401047)(5005006)(8121501046)(10201501046)(3002001)(61426038)(61427038); SRVR:BY2PR0301MB0645; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:BY2PR0301MB0645;
x-forefront-prvs: 0843C17679
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(24454002)(377454003)(1096002)(790700001)(86612001)(76176999)(122556002)(102836003)(92566002)(6116002)(93886004)(3660700001)(5008740100001)(19617315012)(3280700002)(5001960100002)(586003)(1220700001)(19580405001)(50986999)(19300405004)(19580395003)(5001770100001)(4326007)(2906002)(54356999)(99286002)(2950100001)(86362001)(106116001)(15975445007)(16236675004)(19625215002)(5005710100001)(87936001)(40100003)(76576001)(77096005)(10400500002)(33656002)(2900100001)(74316001)(189998001)(10090500001)(11100500001)(5002640100001)(5003600100002)(5004730100002)(10290500002)(3826002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:BY2PR0301MB0645; H:BY2PR0301MB0647.namprd03.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; MLV:sfv; LANG:en;
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:23
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_BY2PR0301MB06471B81A391EBBFCEEC29CF83D20BY2PR0301MB0647_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: microsoft.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 05 Feb 2016 16:26:34.5266 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 72f988bf-86f1-41af-91ab-2d7cd011db47
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BY2PR0301MB0645
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/webpush/rzX3pXdT28k2ww6_r0RlWxVgkSY>
Cc: Benjamin Bangert <bbangert@mozilla.com>, "webpush@ietf.org" <webpush@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Webpush] Require the TTL header
X-BeenThere: webpush@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of potential IETF work on a web push protocol <webpush.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/webpush>, <mailto:webpush-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/webpush/>
List-Post: <mailto:webpush@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:webpush-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/webpush>, <mailto:webpush-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2016 16:26:55 -0000

I opened - https://github.com/webpush-wg/webpush-protocol/issues/76


From: miguelg@google.com [mailto:miguelg@google.com] On Behalf Of Miguel Garcia
Sent: Friday, February 5, 2016 3:32 AM
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Cc: Brian Raymor <Brian.Raymor@microsoft.com>om>; Benjamin Bangert <bbangert@mozilla.com>om>; webpush@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Webpush] Require the TTL header

I agree with this as well. Especially since the default behavior in GCM<%20https:/developers.google.com/cloud-messaging/concept-options#ttl> is different (not supplying it defaults to ttl of 4 weeks). Making it required would avoid unnecessary confusion.

On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 11:26 AM, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com<mailto:martin.thomson@gmail.com>> wrote:
On 5 February 2016 at 16:42, Brian Raymor <Brian.Raymor@microsoft.com<mailto:Brian.Raymor@microsoft.com>> wrote:
>> Can we require a TTL value for web-push notifications?
>
> I'd support this requirement if it helps to enforce correct behavior in implementations.

I'm also in support of this.  Ben makes a good argument.  Removing
defaults and being up-front about potential mistakes was a pretty good
way to ensure solid interoperability for h2.

_______________________________________________
Webpush mailing list
Webpush@ietf.org<mailto:Webpush@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/webpush

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email