Re: [Webpush] Alternate/fallback mechanism for receiving
Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Sun, 21 February 2016 05:18 UTC
Return-Path: <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: webpush@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: webpush@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0FC61B2F96
for <webpush@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 20 Feb 2016 21:18:01 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9,
DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1,
FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id EhIQov0N6y5E for <webpush@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Sat, 20 Feb 2016 21:18:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-io0-x232.google.com (mail-io0-x232.google.com
[IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::232])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 764C61B2EBC
for <webpush@ietf.org>; Sat, 20 Feb 2016 21:18:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-io0-x232.google.com with SMTP id g203so147797507iof.2
for <webpush@ietf.org>; Sat, 20 Feb 2016 21:18:00 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
:cc:content-type;
bh=/o0GdFVtB79AnZrSnOMceQLSaFh7AwrdQuL+X4JQVmY=;
b=ONtodSkX9hPz1rP5J68E8r/5njYihb12lPo1+Svb3dBS8HACPYTUuTDTNitwz4dtly
ARgBk2wIcFsP0V/1Y7wQGoh9lx0Jh6cAGAAZppsbseOZqyo52osgZ4sSlGZxuBXLzOkm
vW1HgBCd34BZJuXsOXx1lCjA3FHmkuOI+5fx5WCx/ASC4ZOOvs9SO0LqseuK0fp8X+uj
yL9U1ekVtCmC5tSjlbK4UgzOl03IUf+C55RMTUy/isR2qagy0xsaeamem54hExG5Dtb2
vv3RTg8o4UaL98FlphbR1m/4dvqoERGr2n8cRP+CbSlCpVBEShfTlRQGC341ClB2AjLL
JDmw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type;
bh=/o0GdFVtB79AnZrSnOMceQLSaFh7AwrdQuL+X4JQVmY=;
b=S0Uc2fo4fk4d34ltRKkitD/vkFXJqQdbkGTmUL0zMtzgDdPtHUOnZq3wVvglASYzGp
lhCRnLGpbf6Qmu6sRmVH8pCahFPJLiOWgycCOWtAydfSk/GK4FXQTJY8rIEJ5b7woAh7
GNgGfvnhIavqQwRhW0s8hcqBj7+We45ue4Aka1p2WRXEV0FGJ0KI8xwI0/liCWSJAL4F
vZbAza2fOqXdb69j0BIAyoVZ27qLreJ4ogY801dAAZG/Z6F8tQTx4jSXp9cRgwEv3OB9
UWF9IqXkI740WH9z0vn7y4VZx8hGYhxe1tyJix2xB4VB/WW2sQPZcrzsG/LMx94CfmFR
JK8w==
X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOTQ1q/lM1TeVIWmBM33xZ4HTYYg3dLg7La46gsDTY09aXm6V6gYIXHADUIMQHvrmcOuDY/c/BPPlmHCYw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.107.34.139 with SMTP id i133mr20351267ioi.108.1456031879844;
Sat, 20 Feb 2016 21:17:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.36.53.79 with HTTP; Sat, 20 Feb 2016 21:17:59 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAP8-FqkWa7xm4tdT+U-mBOVjU1hAeGwYTt3WKWLa1X6dGr9sbA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAP8-Fq=TYTzAVtt7P+bsQ78R=LWwvhPRaTJc=7GXOD06ByKdFw@mail.gmail.com>
<CABkgnnWaPxnHX9pvhep24sajk+grUJXwxk8wt1jfreZM9fvocQ@mail.gmail.com>
<CAP8-FqkWa7xm4tdT+U-mBOVjU1hAeGwYTt3WKWLa1X6dGr9sbA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2016 21:17:59 -0800
Message-ID: <CABkgnnVaSrWowBn929FXQbGtP+krjf1SeJ5UpfD18Jp+FqTbqw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
To: Costin Manolache <costin@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/webpush/tJY0W7dFqj1Uh8o-t9d6yQhpIiU>
Cc: "webpush@ietf.org" <webpush@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Webpush] Alternate/fallback mechanism for receiving
X-BeenThere: webpush@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of potential IETF work on a web push protocol
<webpush.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/webpush>,
<mailto:webpush-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/webpush/>
List-Post: <mailto:webpush@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:webpush-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/webpush>,
<mailto:webpush-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2016 05:18:02 -0000
On 20 February 2016 at 19:22, Costin Manolache <costin@gmail.com> wrote: > Does anyone have a survey of platforms and APIs supporting push promises ? Firefox has an API, though that is still pretty-much internal. nghttp2 has an API: https://www.nghttp2.org/documentation/types.html#c.nghttp2_on_begin_headers_callback I'm not opposed to someone defining a fallback, but I think that it would be better written as a separate document, because it isn't as simple to do as what you describe by a long stretch.
- [Webpush] Alternate/fallback mechanism for receiv… Costin Manolache
- Re: [Webpush] Alternate/fallback mechanism for re… Martin Thomson
- Re: [Webpush] Alternate/fallback mechanism for re… Costin Manolache
- Re: [Webpush] Alternate/fallback mechanism for re… Martin Thomson
- Re: [Webpush] Alternate/fallback mechanism for re… Costin Manolache