Re: [Webpush] Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-ietf-webpush-protocol-11: (with COMMENT)
Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Fri, 14 October 2016 03:39 UTC
Return-Path: <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: webpush@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: webpush@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1B66129450; Thu, 13 Oct 2016 20:39:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id R6diAPrH-pyE; Thu, 13 Oct 2016 20:39:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk0-x236.google.com (mail-qk0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EFB511293D9; Thu, 13 Oct 2016 20:39:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk0-x236.google.com with SMTP id f128so118873888qkb.1; Thu, 13 Oct 2016 20:39:34 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=G/OYM5HsAVdN15POs/Fp+s18fsigXB2128sivPV6+50=; b=HUDoUxWTCmDiJZMNGmDgROIJsRC6ph0fSk1CjoSHoCLTW7tHbiPUI3e9on4iQ8Xm9/ WqhnYnU8sbi07uquxJYe0o25FH+me7ybvq/vry5a954oWqvIGXm07sgMf1IpY08prwhs KdqHFHdeBeQpMW0G+O2tF4ofn2lAjyaNoUnaKgM3WvmOTBqSBR1OLxhGTfL1OfLP/JYE Qd/GmZJ6w+pfgYpGdPCdSFWyT+/btp/xlzrlzvxYbrWkM6NrPLY3AAQvGZyZLxFawjkW AhpTxZot4AK+1jEy/3/Hi/3wGpBGIYgWT/CoGTfp600p6FhMrd4fIacOjfq9tDKnzn6i ks3w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=G/OYM5HsAVdN15POs/Fp+s18fsigXB2128sivPV6+50=; b=FRV5IoQf4y+x/0wX4oKgzS3XGGFCa1SKuF+8yoorWpKb3w4Qs9gFFcpUFJOmdujosX 4adipX8IV7PJQY8byGJRsA1Azw+5YVnNGrGIUmkEp8nwKHpgSdH4bk5+KidPbjDsHNyu 0T2IVirbv1yplX5AmYaAbSASF1MjFVOFbMGNtvO6Wt5BcQwHV5gzKqR1LK2jLp47hQuf AuHnoJtl0GTpJykuvlT4eX6GkRpgLQcG0EnE0QOkpeEuuUmb4Kq+yLGz7Omz28w0uoRO IaH4pygI4T4egG7SnLFvPH3aYPsP4A9CKGeG+6KbhJcBNzGOnn1jmvovePqmWrdQo5ap JahQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AA6/9Rn/epboeotcTvbhjNRx6dn35nWMR+1+vO+3xMasj3O2e0nv59Up0Z4KbNBUL/LaTf5ySbxF4LaXWGIC5Q==
X-Received: by 10.55.74.6 with SMTP id x6mr11102071qka.316.1476416374039; Thu, 13 Oct 2016 20:39:34 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.140.85.7 with HTTP; Thu, 13 Oct 2016 20:39:33 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <147636581973.2847.16077617885564526707.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <147636581973.2847.16077617885564526707.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2016 14:39:33 +1100
Message-ID: <CABkgnnUwzFrbLbtf7Sbq2vG1U_tFd1++_K04eOL=x1d1cyeOng@mail.gmail.com>
To: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/webpush/v1WEGYl7JAypnEb-6PfsUEGp_-M>
Cc: Shida Schubert <shida@ntt-at.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-webpush-protocol@ietf.org, dromasca@gmail.com, webpush-chairs@ietf.org, "webpush@ietf.org" <webpush@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Webpush] Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-ietf-webpush-protocol-11: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: webpush@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of potential IETF work on a web push protocol <webpush.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/webpush>, <mailto:webpush-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/webpush/>
List-Post: <mailto:webpush@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:webpush-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/webpush>, <mailto:webpush-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2016 03:39:36 -0000
On 14 October 2016 at 00:36, Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com> wrote: > Benoit Claise has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-webpush-protocol-11: No Objection [...] > Here is Dan Romascanu's OPS DIR review: I have confess, I don't see an awful lot of actionable material in this review. I worry that RFC 5706 isn't an entirely appropriate template for a review of this sort of thing. I will concede that the level of consistency across the industry when it comes to managing and operating HTTP servers and services is almost uniformly inconsistent. Dan does observe that the draft doesn't mention that typical HTTP operational practices apply; it was my understanding that this was assumed to be obvious enough to omit. (I'm happy to have a more involved conversation about operational and management concerns with push services, but it's probably something that is better done with a different CC list.)
- [Webpush] Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-i… Benoit Claise
- Re: [Webpush] Benoit Claise's No Objection on dra… Martin Thomson
- Re: [Webpush] Benoit Claise's No Objection on dra… Benoit Claise
- Re: [Webpush] Benoit Claise's No Objection on dra… Dan Romascanu