IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Webpush] Ben Campbell's Yes on draft-ietf-webpush-protocol-11: (with COMMENT)

Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com> Thu, 13 October 2016 03:12 UTC

Return-Path: <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: webpush@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: webpush@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05B151296A0; Wed, 12 Oct 2016 20:12:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5N-6Bzfam3OL; Wed, 12 Oct 2016 20:12:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yw0-x232.google.com (mail-yw0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c05::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C71F712969F; Wed, 12 Oct 2016 20:12:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yw0-x232.google.com with SMTP id t192so45441149ywf.0; Wed, 12 Oct 2016 20:12:46 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=G/lCf5rOwrzfVPRCVwjl0JClHWfkA6m4d3QBKBLIkuQ=; b=IgWZTs7Zs0lvMbpwmI2Ck7MnDeKH3xNZ8+DjZy06dz/mc5UWdA10BBeieG40lEm14N 5+KQ06m/Ue+RAVwYAbn3IhOh2Liy8Gk2h6xkNy3jcdpK77Jo+kC2sWmd53Ivqx/OyX04 Vq/dJ3JW0bB0GxFCHdSIRtdDZufWM+5JTzWiN7rWly6B9OZYXTeJkWEZVJ5nwhBoTY2L hcMwhfAEN5wMLm0IRIF0Nh7+fGQQaQ1m77hHniyAo9SxS2J8b4ww5EjW2ONd3zZB7SV4 CRpe6sgpDlIXcJTVCbKV9EYCnqoJ5QupQ2syOvllgm1ucE+YoLtjC6sTgY9xHeOswvPY QXvQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=G/lCf5rOwrzfVPRCVwjl0JClHWfkA6m4d3QBKBLIkuQ=; b=CtgLK6T11hznnPcUOoa0/71BRMXIcdXgGqfNk0V2k9xLOb4nRt8N45elZ83wKpaiGn qKaPU+PuYbOt/lOLvwKRZ7izY8o1sTXq4JOgLxP8O49/jptJs3vt0DwxYv7+aTh5X04L r+9LQPODKhzAzUpml9aR+BiqTzCg5V8su4DktcbaHe9Me4WCkQudA/Bk2Z5Z5KtDClzk 0LKqD7e0yrJeQTVOB3Avz8j9ku51z9cxhvZ26Noo6m8acRVu+pR9BoAdJWgBsOC8c4B/ n4nojBkNqMIk/x17F66fLnjTzzuJ50fj/qN0XtEkBzEhJl5jrE7MsmSA8Y6EfitR+gQw JVDQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AA6/9Rnhc64k0bA0Y/qRVY5kLEQnrZjl/nSYSgdAacxNYLtAHlf0boc0srzW90L4Unnh5USdKbzRZ/nc+TFUBg==
X-Received: by 10.13.214.12 with SMTP id y12mr3795919ywd.152.1476328366041; Wed, 12 Oct 2016 20:12:46 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.37.92.67 with HTTP; Wed, 12 Oct 2016 20:12:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.37.92.67 with HTTP; Wed, 12 Oct 2016 20:12:45 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <9E2486CD-4A05-42A2-AB57-45C309E64DF6@nostrum.com>
References: <147630754676.6419.3793529940535426058.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CABkgnnW9yP8NHC7xJwN-qt_0Oc=WrxRhWcMO3=YY_8qFvAyzhA@mail.gmail.com> <CAKKJt-fKL-p_Jh-wE8LdYM3RyxBFH1fXtdN8sKoMsuK8XLNnNw@mail.gmail.com> <ADBF3344-5318-4E8D-8A17-1A6941AA86AC@nostrum.com> <CABkgnnWvCSnB=vQK5e+Bu8mBg0=DftfoqJoE065vh7y==x5e1w@mail.gmail.com> <9E2486CD-4A05-42A2-AB57-45C309E64DF6@nostrum.com>
From: Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2016 22:12:45 -0500
Message-ID: <CAKKJt-cMnYbWsLnEjxJ2_h0ArEbYN5t4JSR5qYaFSSm09hbmxw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c073bbcd46fb1053eb67b2d"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/webpush/yRltyA5Jzejke5TEq7yibehJpRM>
Cc: Brian Raymor <Brian.Raymor@microsoft.com>, webpush-chairs@ietf.org, Shida Schubert <shida@ntt-at.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-webpush-protocol@ietf.org, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>, "webpush@ietf.org" <webpush@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Webpush] Ben Campbell's Yes on draft-ietf-webpush-protocol-11: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: webpush@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of potential IETF work on a web push protocol <webpush.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/webpush>, <mailto:webpush-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/webpush/>
List-Post: <mailto:webpush@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:webpush-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/webpush>, <mailto:webpush-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2016 03:12:49 -0000

Hi, Martin,

On Oct 12, 2016 19:51, "Ben Campbell" <ben@nostrum.com> wrote:
>
> On 12 Oct 2016, at 19:33, Martin Thomson wrote:
>
>> On 13 October 2016 at 11:21, Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> But I think I now understand this to mean e2e protection, at least with
>>> respect to the push service. Some clarification would help. Also, that
seems
>>> conceptually bound more to section 8.1 than 8. (Or was 8.1 intended to
>>> expand on the mention in 8?)
>>
>>
>> Yes, we should be clearer.  And yes, 8.1 was intended to expand on the
>> intro to Section 8.  Now that I look at this again, it's probably
>> better to move that statement to 8.1.
>> I hope this helps:
https://github.com/webpush-wg/webpush-protocol/pull/138
>
>
> That works for me.

That's superb.

And of course I meant that I didn't know whether Ben was happy YET :-)

Spencer

> Thanks!
>
> Ben.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email