IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Webpush] Receipt subscription follow-up

Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Thu, 28 April 2016 00:34 UTC

Return-Path: <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: webpush@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: webpush@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D5FD12D50A for <webpush@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Apr 2016 17:34:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CYcrBWAzc85q for <webpush@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Apr 2016 17:34:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ig0-x22e.google.com (mail-ig0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8CB8B12D1E9 for <webpush@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 Apr 2016 17:34:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ig0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id bi2so144577435igb.0 for <webpush@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 Apr 2016 17:34:32 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc; bh=Asq0zY/8JqbtEH45NID3Xx96hhv+5s28dWM3W+emrX0=; b=CXFUqd+XS1fousZ31WlhX9KCq2QFZXfVp35dSQhS3zHa8YiSjpZbiR6JK/rf3J9NFY ZALZxp8AcchW2RA0Uz7rWxraBBgro3v+sjRp63Vt2ZlLvyHl14gQhgMmT02jtE6jEutt otC2IzT/WZ3Cs/zLFQFKD+ptayAIVul5eKXWqt09w5DzFH/bHJiN7X7vttUXZkcaC+/k V1hLZDWKhjxviNuRjhHY/OI3+QKbNnDifHIcr75gtjkzStYXgmXzgG63GYMK/dWnsHlV CRppvI0rYhejO0oQW9uho3tVrbr6K9HlDZs+y/E42WTlx4LZKVxnsD2mVGBwM/G911aB WViA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc; bh=Asq0zY/8JqbtEH45NID3Xx96hhv+5s28dWM3W+emrX0=; b=EpW9KOBbFRHMEtiB4MX2dVrXdmbR9AA5bnEgGbiL/ZqIc1fbz2lMUdYQ2wQ6MEsGXb k1pov+BTzYZDUKFijtjF3+Z+F3GLYMApQ+dCxIqo1mEy0jlLGFHKtlxHsYomVooi1kIY I+bXbmJaonD6hiJ4XYFPdZjPscRZu1e8+OJMCB100grelmqNN+IYIT+dhSQTok6z10Mw BNMskDU9v03J53AmOTdTDtF7WJhKh3fZP2YOtQUgZE9THyH9yjNw6DBPAx98Amp2982R Ud11PJM2Ve9TIh14Wu7Dt0JjILQY56boQtYOu3E0AZdFSgHhHsFnUe4COcB5HD1NzhnV +N1Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FUvUkLDenEOFAfFe2E4DhGJDSp0CiBY/l30w0TNH19JSDM9Qdva+QiRqGctEW92b1rr3HAGgWE4//BRcA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.50.111.15 with SMTP id ie15mr14858576igb.94.1461803672022; Wed, 27 Apr 2016 17:34:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.36.43.82 with HTTP; Wed, 27 Apr 2016 17:34:31 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CO2PR03MB2407C751A0F725A2D8916DEE83650@CO2PR03MB2407.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
References: <CABkgnnXKDZvLWxkhFP0R4jW=ZyFwqiqQREFA5BFKH9i4PQCmyA@mail.gmail.com> <CO2PR03MB24076724ECF95BDBB9B83E0F83640@CO2PR03MB2407.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> <CAP8-Fqk8p1HkbJkB60UoE=jeQPa9CKorgc8kqSF7sUMS3FcAfQ@mail.gmail.com> <CABkgnnU_jnSuUX7TC+qy2SwteU1tW9DEAb0uoHmhOcYNQaYuvw@mail.gmail.com> <CO2PR03MB24079FEC854A49F60C66F81583640@CO2PR03MB2407.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> <CAP8-Fq=aufZchVdqCM=+0+7WxGvgoaez0t8J2x=U6_Mz91s+Yg@mail.gmail.com> <CABkgnnW=_3BfHGmr=fVo_gx3dE3bLrPqMFcPvHqWt6cfOJVnaQ@mail.gmail.com> <CO2PR03MB2407C751A0F725A2D8916DEE83650@CO2PR03MB2407.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2016 10:34:31 +1000
Message-ID: <CABkgnnWDp1QiagN3W=xZaUTWy+hScGsV-dkRZzdAHKHCRnTVXA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
To: Brian Raymor <Brian.Raymor@microsoft.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/webpush/ypCuzpCH_hOd6wxieqrgoxfFOgQ>
Cc: Costin Manolache <costin@gmail.com>, "webpush@ietf.org" <webpush@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Webpush] Receipt subscription follow-up
X-BeenThere: webpush@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of potential IETF work on a web push protocol <webpush.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/webpush>, <mailto:webpush-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/webpush/>
List-Post: <mailto:webpush@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:webpush-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/webpush>, <mailto:webpush-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2016 00:34:33 -0000

On 28 April 2016 at 10:29, Brian Raymor <Brian.Raymor@microsoft.com> wrote:
> PS can already rate control an AS:

This was about the reverse, having rate control on the delivery of
receipts to the AS.  It's possible that a PS could overwhelm an AS
with these.

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email