IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Webpush] Non-blocking comments on -05

Brian Raymor <Brian.Raymor@microsoft.com> Wed, 01 June 2016 03:43 UTC

Return-Path: <Brian.Raymor@microsoft.com>
X-Original-To: webpush@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: webpush@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEA2E12D0E0 for <webpush@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 May 2016 20:43:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.002
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.002 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=microsoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KRRf5YzjZUJ5 for <webpush@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 May 2016 20:43:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from na01-bn1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bn1bon0761.outbound.protection.outlook.com [IPv6:2a01:111:f400:fc10::1:761]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EB66712D0BD for <webpush@ietf.org>; Tue, 31 May 2016 20:43:05 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=selector1; h=From:To:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=u/gqNWVhv0n37CaywY+nAx69k5WEC5VRydyzO3ZcYRA=; b=COhW6IwDNjV7rUbOC54Bcj5wqD7laz5WmlWvTRsLOyhrukvrjiwUD2DqWMXEZugt7bofTtBhQ/UFh63zp9O5ODzIg1e1aq3DYNbylA3eEg3XIOUke/N9PG2RLTlrJHeW97b0uj0iCzRmZhDNw1hUxSbkoQX8GajAg9oNfQtTybs=
Received: from CO2PR03MB2407.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.166.93.137) by CO2PR03MB2405.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.166.93.135) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P384) id 15.1.506.9; Wed, 1 Jun 2016 03:42:44 +0000
Received: from CO2PR03MB2407.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ([10.166.93.137]) by CO2PR03MB2407.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ([10.166.93.137]) with mapi id 15.01.0506.011; Wed, 1 Jun 2016 03:42:44 +0000
From: Brian Raymor <Brian.Raymor@microsoft.com>
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>, Peter Beverloo <beverloo@google.com>
Thread-Topic: [Webpush] Non-blocking comments on -05
Thread-Index: AQHRu3RQwDJq8LaJ6EaFkMQ0Dd4KCZ/T6WgAgAAK9+A=
Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2016 03:42:44 +0000
Message-ID: <CO2PR03MB240753E779A28BD536187CE783470@CO2PR03MB2407.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
References: <CALt3x6=_yc9TegOut_g+6W5fvhP7sfW+_gwRZnEVFA5PNgER6Q@mail.gmail.com> <CABkgnnUn7NSrh_vpEhezaBDCxWkt3fdnw8KxHjRtAH=23Hat-A@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABkgnnUn7NSrh_vpEhezaBDCxWkt3fdnw8KxHjRtAH=23Hat-A@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: gmail.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;gmail.com; dmarc=none action=none header.from=microsoft.com;
x-originating-ip: [24.16.23.27]
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 25d6ff03-4342-43bf-399b-08d389cecab3
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; CO2PR03MB2405; 5:Yl+4XH1jOi/CZHmHfvvjAbptIR0I3+HnbTK+xo1267kW+6xzNVnng8p1hdVfQdMw2CUYD/t4yy+CBxOlqcwCuXn3IQjiQnniRQiNkMGLPZBUZNPozMW2a/EOf4OD0qOeND1QF66vo5Gxv2qDtEHN4g==; 24:rsqP1HgrkEXuhz2MokVkWB2gKmWos98WfXGcc2gGzTvZES+7SZXA0RCzw6ZDLomfPKJu7ZqpRy0ZbXLOdp69mte5PVGg9FHwrnIV5Ngqt3w=; 7:riNsii/zQ1P7HrKsZx36Ive655GsEQyphLoTbhHLVY8tXnzqWWl5YC2mNGYTdIuyvdeKNwmrXcnQnyUGoeJbvhOPFLXc+X4/BdoTd2pOQNXOlFSOx911ncoIrvpQHD8ObEP+YFC8A0ZaG0zTRVGaQM2z05l7NA2mYRhtKtWlTJbIbduZHshQH+jX6tsma38yUxwE2E6ss22sIqQ2SJiFag==
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:CO2PR03MB2405;
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <CO2PR03MB24054A75C7929602ADD12F7583470@CO2PR03MB2405.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(166708455590820)(211936372134217);
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(61425038)(601004)(2401047)(5005006)(8121501046)(3002001)(10201501046)(6055026)(61426038)(61427038); SRVR:CO2PR03MB2405; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:CO2PR03MB2405;
x-forefront-prvs: 096029FF66
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(377454003)(11100500001)(10090500001)(19580395003)(5002640100001)(122556002)(86612001)(189998001)(2950100001)(87936001)(5005710100001)(86362001)(99286002)(92566002)(19580405001)(5004730100002)(5001770100001)(10400500002)(5003600100002)(8676002)(10290500002)(106116001)(81166006)(8936002)(15975445007)(77096005)(3660700001)(33656002)(54356999)(102836003)(50986999)(66066001)(3280700002)(76176999)(6116002)(4326007)(3846002)(9686002)(2906002)(2900100001)(74316001)(586003)(76576001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:CO2PR03MB2405; H:CO2PR03MB2407.namprd03.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; MLV:sfv; LANG:en;
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:23
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: microsoft.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 01 Jun 2016 03:42:44.5602 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 72f988bf-86f1-41af-91ab-2d7cd011db47
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: CO2PR03MB2405
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/webpush/yvYQFyL2V-djYQHbvGosU_30K44>
Cc: "webpush@ietf.org" <webpush@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Webpush] Non-blocking comments on -05
X-BeenThere: webpush@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of potential IETF work on a web push protocol <webpush.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/webpush>, <mailto:webpush-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/webpush/>
List-Post: <mailto:webpush@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:webpush-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/webpush>, <mailto:webpush-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2016 03:43:09 -0000

On May 31, 2016, at 12:40 PM, Peter Beverloo <beverloo@google.com> asked:
> Have we considered not sending receipts for messages with TTL=0 at all?

There was some early discussion in https://github.com/webpush-wg/webpush-protocol/issues/24.

There were no major objections at the time. It just felt odd to have a special case for TTL=0 in comparison to TTL=1.

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email