IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Webpush] VAPID as a WG item?

Shida Schubert <shida@ntt-at.com> Mon, 04 April 2016 18:14 UTC

Return-Path: <shida@ntt-at.com>
X-Original-To: webpush@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: webpush@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 485D112D16A for <webpush@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Apr 2016 11:14:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.919
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.919 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8luskcpxDrck for <webpush@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Apr 2016 11:14:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gateway22.websitewelcome.com (gateway22.websitewelcome.com [192.185.47.79]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6D3E512D135 for <webpush@ietf.org>; Mon, 4 Apr 2016 11:14:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cm4.websitewelcome.com (unknown [108.167.139.16]) by gateway22.websitewelcome.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB26E5BA49F83 for <webpush@ietf.org>; Mon, 4 Apr 2016 13:11:43 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from gator4135.hostgator.com ([192.185.4.147]) by cm4.websitewelcome.com with id eJBg1s00e3AKFgo01JBhvq; Mon, 04 Apr 2016 13:11:43 -0500
Received: from dhcp-b411.meeting.ietf.org ([31.133.180.17]:49887) by gator4135.hostgator.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.86_1) (envelope-from <shida@ntt-at.com>) id 1an8yR-000229-PZ; Mon, 04 Apr 2016 13:11:40 -0500
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_55F69E26-F0BE-4CCD-98BB-2461150AEE48"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2104\))
From: Shida Schubert <shida@ntt-at.com>
In-Reply-To: <CALt3x6=3fGf880=7vvdzxODn8TdxqTUtnkU+mVccNVYrN_Syww@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2016 15:11:35 -0300
Message-Id: <933D84BA-4D88-4AB2-9B79-041AF98835B9@ntt-at.com>
References: <B6007B58-573A-4E30-8AB2-E47E48ED95B9@ntt-at.com> <CALt3x6=3fGf880=7vvdzxODn8TdxqTUtnkU+mVccNVYrN_Syww@mail.gmail.com>
To: "webpush@ietf.org" <webpush@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2104)
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - gator4135.hostgator.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - ntt-at.com
X-BWhitelist: no
X-Source-IP: 31.133.180.17
X-Exim-ID: 1an8yR-000229-PZ
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
X-Source-Sender: dhcp-b411.meeting.ietf.org [31.133.180.17]:49887
X-Source-Auth: shida@agnada.com
X-Email-Count: 4
X-Source-Cap: c3NoaWRhO3NzaGlkYTtnYXRvcjQxMzUuaG9zdGdhdG9yLmNvbQ==
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/webpush/z33h8nuJUJ4pZQDc8tyYGf9O4Wk>
Cc: Peter Beverloo <beverloo@google.com>
Subject: Re: [Webpush] VAPID as a WG item?
X-BeenThere: webpush@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of potential IETF work on a web push protocol <webpush.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/webpush>, <mailto:webpush-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/webpush/>
List-Post: <mailto:webpush@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:webpush-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/webpush>, <mailto:webpush-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2016 18:14:27 -0000

All;

We received very little support for adopting the VAPID draft. 

I personally believe this draft will add a lot of value to the overall security of webpush. 

It’s a very short draft so please scan the draft before the session today as I will be polling the WG about adopting the draft at today’s session.

Thanks! 
Shida

> On Mar 14, 2016, at 8:46 AM, Peter Beverloo <beverloo@google.com> wrote:
> 
> Yes, we are.  In addition, we're also working on an implementation and
> expect to feed back our experiences there in case anything comes up.
> 
> Specific to question (1), there may be some overlap with Martin's question
> of whether to adopt it as the solution to Issue 44.
> 
> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/webpush/current/msg00411.html <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/webpush/current/msg00411.html>
> 
> Thanks,
> Peter
> 
> On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 11:47 PM, Shida Schubert <shida@ntt-at.com <mailto:shida@ntt-at.com>> wrote:
> 
> All;
> 
> I am wanting to hear people’s opinion on adopting draft-thomson-webpush-vapid as a WG item.
> 
> I will need to talk to AD about adding this to a milestone (or as part of the core protocol milestone) but before I go ahead and do that, I want to see if people in the WG are;
> 
> 1. Interested to work on the problem it’s trying to solve.
> 2. Willing to review and contribute to move this forward.
> 
> Thanks!
> Shida as co-chair
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Webpush mailing list
> Webpush@ietf.org <mailto:Webpush@ietf.org>
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/webpush <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/webpush>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Webpush mailing list
> Webpush@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/webpush

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email