[Webpush] Adopting thomson-webpush-protocol-00 as WG item

Shida Schubert <shida@ntt-at.com> Mon, 15 June 2015 05:01 UTC

Return-Path: <shida@ntt-at.com>
X-Original-To: webpush@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: webpush@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE89E1B31B9 for <webpush@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 14 Jun 2015 22:01:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.001
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_40=-0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id u8SFk52dUb3v for <webpush@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 14 Jun 2015 22:01:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gator4135.hostgator.com (gator4135.hostgator.com []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0B5651B31B8 for <webpush@ietf.org>; Sun, 14 Jun 2015 22:00:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [] (port=44072 helo=[]) by gator4135.hostgator.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <shida@ntt-at.com>) id 1Z4MVz-0003uK-Sq; Mon, 15 Jun 2015 00:00:56 -0500
From: Shida Schubert <shida@ntt-at.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_097A1B41-3C2B-48BF-82C2-69900246C744"
Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2015 22:00:52 -0700
Message-Id: <0067651F-8C90-44DC-BC27-FF6F4D53F654@ntt-at.com>
To: webpush@ietf.org
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2098\))
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2098)
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - gator4135.hostgator.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - ntt-at.com
X-BWhitelist: no
X-Exim-ID: 1Z4MVz-0003uK-Sq
X-Source-Sender: ([]) []:44072
X-Source-Auth: shida@agnada.com
X-Email-Count: 2
X-Source-Cap: c3NoaWRhO3NzaGlkYTtnYXRvcjQxMzUuaG9zdGdhdG9yLmNvbQ==
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/webpush/zTcUHrqP4_shebqLPkzml_4bzd4>
Cc: webpush-chairs@tools.ietf.org
Subject: [Webpush] Adopting thomson-webpush-protocol-00 as WG item
X-BeenThere: webpush@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of potential IETF work on a web push protocol <webpush.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/webpush>, <mailto:webpush-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/webpush/>
List-Post: <mailto:webpush@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:webpush-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/webpush>, <mailto:webpush-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2015 05:01:20 -0000

(as WG cochair)

We have a draft for the core push protocol:

https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-thomson-webpush-protocol-00.txt <https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-thomson-webpush-protocol-00.txt>

As mentioned at the last IETF, the call for adopting the merged draft as the WG item was to be brought to the list as the two drafts presented at the last IETF were merged. The draft referenced above is such draft, so I am here to call the adoption of  this draft as WG item.

Please respond by June 29th as to whether the text is acceptable to adopt and work on as WG draft, or not.