Re: [Webpush] webpush - Update to a Meeting Session Request for IETF 100

Phil Sorber <sorber@apache.org> Fri, 06 October 2017 03:12 UTC

Return-Path: <sorber@apache.org>
X-Original-To: webpush@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: webpush@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 467811341F8 for <webpush@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Oct 2017 20:12:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.42
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.42 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MlygwfsKdbPV for <webpush@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Oct 2017 20:12:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 8B98213432B for <webpush@ietf.org>; Thu, 5 Oct 2017 20:12:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 34647 invoked by uid 99); 6 Oct 2017 03:12:14 -0000
Received: from mail-relay.apache.org (HELO mail-relay.apache.org) (140.211.11.15) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 Oct 2017 03:12:14 +0000
Received: from mail-qt0-f169.google.com (mail-qt0-f169.google.com [209.85.216.169]) by mail-relay.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mail-relay.apache.org) with ESMTPSA id 93DAD1A0117; Fri, 6 Oct 2017 03:12:14 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-qt0-f169.google.com with SMTP id d13so28461026qta.5; Thu, 05 Oct 2017 20:12:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Gm-Message-State: AMCzsaU4GuZl0T+niJmLqJOBnRVJA7gM0l3r97fkpo035IBpGlhsWIQn 8i345njUJNyjutwuI9w7WN8ClDoNQHza93YdzzU=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AOwi7QApO5pTjExRAs8x0o8LN/ZNgo+C578orTdtJsI9hYvxeVgAPLA9VqyFiVumGuccKlKBhu9lK0A5OUq+XdlaNMI=
X-Received: by 10.200.44.81 with SMTP id e17mr1062455qta.332.1507259533459; Thu, 05 Oct 2017 20:12:13 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <150723885633.6006.1059710724683190689.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CABkgnnXhJtNAyiHnHWQ82zoZ84rtTxiVAcBRvio+j6dHxgwSXQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABkgnnXhJtNAyiHnHWQ82zoZ84rtTxiVAcBRvio+j6dHxgwSXQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Phil Sorber <sorber@apache.org>
Date: Fri, 06 Oct 2017 03:12:02 +0000
X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: <CABF6JR3Pz7pRjt=0tjh3e19AzeDYDAz67HQ-eqyxxz5U0ygVQg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CABF6JR3Pz7pRjt=0tjh3e19AzeDYDAz67HQ-eqyxxz5U0ygVQg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>, IETF Meeting Session Request Tool <session-request@ietf.org>
Cc: webpush-chairs@ietf.org, Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>, "webpush@ietf.org" <webpush@ietf.org>, Stephanie McCammon <smccammon@amsl.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a114047961388c8055ad83551"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/webpush/zsrUpZlCWLTuBGhe_HWd2g_5lGM>
Subject: Re: [Webpush] webpush - Update to a Meeting Session Request for IETF 100
X-BeenThere: webpush@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of potential IETF work on a web push protocol <webpush.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/webpush>, <mailto:webpush-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/webpush/>
List-Post: <mailto:webpush@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:webpush-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/webpush>, <mailto:webpush-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Oct 2017 03:12:18 -0000

We decided to have a spot on the schedule after all to see if EKR can come
and discuss his DISCUSS further. He still has some concerns and I think an
in person might be the best way to at least come to a concrete plan if not
a solution. If we can get it resolved before the meeting then we can give
the slot back.

Thanks.

On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 3:57 PM Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>;
wrote:

> I am assuming that this request was made in error, and the "Not having
> a session" registered by Phil is what is correct.
>
> On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 2:27 PM, IETF Meeting Session Request Tool
> <session-request@ietf.org>; wrote:
> >
> >
> > An update to a meeting session request has just been submitted by
> Stephanie McCammon, on behalf of the webpush working group.
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------
> > Working Group Name: Web-Based Push Notifications
> > Area Name: Applications and Real-Time Area
> > Session Requester: Stephanie McCammon
> >
> > Number of Sessions: 1
> > Length of Session(s):  1 Hour
> > Number of Attendees: 30
> > Conflicts to Avoid:
> >  First Priority: dispatch httpbis mmusic tram rtcweb modern core quic
> doh cdni
> >  Second Priority: netvc perc sipcore
> >  Third Priority: clue
> >
> >
> > People who must be present:
> >   Eric Rescorla
> >   Adam Roach
> >   Martin Thomson
> >   Joe Hildebrand
> >   Phil Sorber
> >
> > Resources Requested:
> >
> > Special Requests:
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Webpush mailing list
> > Webpush@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/webpush
>