[websec] RFC 6797 on HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)
rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Mon, 19 November 2012 23:47 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: websec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: websec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B961721F86C7; Mon, 19 Nov 2012 15:47:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.933
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.933 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.067, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_93=0.6, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id J2huqQ3FTjH1; Mon, 19 Nov 2012 15:47:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [IPv6:2001:1890:123a::1:2f]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18A8E21F86AD; Mon, 19 Nov 2012 15:47:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 4E111B1E003; Mon, 19 Nov 2012 15:40:18 -0800 (PST)
To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Message-Id: <20121119234018.4E111B1E003@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 15:40:18 -0800
Cc: websec@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Subject: [websec] RFC 6797 on HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)
X-BeenThere: websec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Web Application Security Minus Authentication and Transport <websec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/websec>, <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/websec>
List-Post: <mailto:websec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/websec>, <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 23:47:37 -0000
A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 6797 Title: HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) Author: J. Hodges, C. Jackson, A. Barth Status: Standards Track Stream: IETF Date: November 2012 Mailbox: Jeff.Hodges@PayPal.com, collin.jackson@sv.cmu.edu, ietf@adambarth.com Pages: 46 Characters: 103554 Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso: None I-D Tag: draft-ietf-websec-strict-transport-sec-14.txt URL: http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6797.txt This specification defines a mechanism enabling web sites to declare themselves accessible only via secure connections and/or for users to be able to direct their user agent(s) to interact with given sites only over secure connections. This overall policy is referred to as HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS). The policy is declared by web sites via the Strict-Transport-Security HTTP response header field and/or by other means, such as user agent configuration, for example. [STANDARDS-TRACK] This document is a product of the Web Security Working Group of the IETF. This is now a Proposed Standard Protocol. STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet standards track protocol for the Internet community,and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the Internet Official Protocol Standards (STD 1) for the standardization state and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce http://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfcsearch.html. For downloading RFCs, see http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc.html. Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC
- [websec] RFC 6797 on HTTP Strict Transport Securi… rfc-editor
- Re: [websec] RFC 6797 on HTTP Strict Transport Se… Peter Saint-Andre