Re: [websec] new rev: draft-ietf-websec-strict-transport-sec-07

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <msk@cloudmark.com> Fri, 04 May 2012 05:16 UTC

Return-Path: <msk@cloudmark.com>
X-Original-To: websec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: websec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4886721F86C2 for <websec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 May 2012 22:16:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.625
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.625 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.026, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sPw2xNl3KjIF for <websec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 May 2012 22:16:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.cloudmark.com (cmgw1.cloudmark.com [208.83.136.25]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCEE221F8666 for <websec@ietf.org>; Thu, 3 May 2012 22:16:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ht1-outbound.cloudmark.com ([72.5.239.26]) by mail.cloudmark.com with bizsmtp id 5hGV1j0010as01C01hGV5z; Thu, 03 May 2012 22:16:29 -0700
X-CMAE-Match: 0
X-CMAE-Score: 0.00
X-CMAE-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=bcDpoZzB c=1 sm=1 a=QMZKka45TBd+hNGtXG2bIg==:17 a=ldJM1g7oyCcA:10 a=IwnkqaXHG70A:10 a=zutiEJmiVI4A:10 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=xqWC_Br6kY4A:10 a=9395Y4Cp13saUTRnxMAA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=QMZKka45TBd+hNGtXG2bIg==:117
Received: from EXCH-MBX901.corp.cloudmark.com ([fe80::addf:849a:f71c:4a82]) by exch-htcas902.corp.cloudmark.com ([fe80::54de:dc60:5f3e:334%10]) with mapi id 14.01.0355.002; Thu, 3 May 2012 22:16:29 -0700
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <msk@cloudmark.com>
To: IETF WebSec WG <websec@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [websec] new rev: draft-ietf-websec-strict-transport-sec-07
Thread-Index: AQHNKKOVIK8xOP6K90aK+FVnv+njq5a4/8WwgAAYvuA=
Date: Fri, 4 May 2012 05:16:29 +0000
Message-ID: <9452079D1A51524AA5749AD23E00392810D69E@exch-mbx901.corp.cloudmark.com>
References: <4FA19B4F.9060606@KingsMountain.com> <9452079D1A51524AA5749AD23E00392810C59D@exch-mbx901.corp.cloudmark.com>
In-Reply-To: <9452079D1A51524AA5749AD23E00392810C59D@exch-mbx901.corp.cloudmark.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [67.160.203.60]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cloudmark.com; s=default; t=1336108589; bh=YVghW5vRKW7/lOfDfFNnp2WBoVLjwNTrRJXfqgwjSRY=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:References:In-Reply-To: Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; b=Ao3WjHZyM+/SGIiNMontf+UxEOv3K99IcNWnIhsNcOXUvGdOK6ZWzak78VjSJIBZK 5aQUl5yLgmz24iCqO3ZvxCfPTXzs1M6mgUdNpSJLElxslF66iruBqT1OXl1rFBT9O2 WO81G/bpBE313E4bipg97z8sjSbTQpD86a65A59k=
Subject: Re: [websec] new rev: draft-ietf-websec-strict-transport-sec-07
X-BeenThere: websec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Web Application Security Minus Authentication and Transport <websec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/websec>, <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/websec>
List-Post: <mailto:websec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/websec>, <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 May 2012 05:16:52 -0000

Nevermind all of that.  It looks like that's covered in RFC2616 Section 4.2.

-MSK