Re: [websec] #43: HSTS: cite draft-reschke-http-status-308 and mention HTTP status code 308 ?
"websec issue tracker" <trac+websec@trac.tools.ietf.org> Mon, 30 April 2012 17:19 UTC
Return-Path: <trac+websec@trac.tools.ietf.org>
X-Original-To: websec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: websec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BEEE21F8851 for <websec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 10:19:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8a5NtWtaSYIl for <websec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 10:19:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gamay.tools.ietf.org (gamay.tools.ietf.org [208.66.40.242]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3170E21F8850 for <websec@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 10:19:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=gamay.tools.ietf.org) by gamay.tools.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from <trac+websec@trac.tools.ietf.org>) id 1SOuFt-0005cT-1n; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 13:19:21 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: websec issue tracker <trac+websec@trac.tools.ietf.org>
X-Trac-Version: 0.12.2
Precedence: bulk
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
X-Mailer: Trac 0.12.2, by Edgewall Software
To: draft-ietf-websec-strict-transport-sec@tools.ietf.org, julian.reschke@gmx.de
X-Trac-Project: websec
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2012 17:19:20 -0000
X-URL: http://tools.ietf.org/websec/
X-Trac-Ticket-URL: http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/websec/trac/ticket/43#comment:1
Message-ID: <085.fbb5cb1c16993206d285c5ccc7ea43d0@trac.tools.ietf.org>
References: <070.a272a1155a8eb877ff88d2ef3522188e@trac.tools.ietf.org>
X-Trac-Ticket-ID: 43
In-Reply-To: <070.a272a1155a8eb877ff88d2ef3522188e@trac.tools.ietf.org>
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: ::1
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: draft-ietf-websec-strict-transport-sec@tools.ietf.org, julian.reschke@gmx.de, websec@ietf.org
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: trac+websec@trac.tools.ietf.org
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on gamay.tools.ietf.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Resent-To:
Resent-Message-Id: <20120430171936.3170E21F8850@ietfa.amsl.com>
Resent-Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2012 10:19:35 -0700
Resent-From: trac+websec@trac.tools.ietf.org
Cc: websec@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [websec] #43: HSTS: cite draft-reschke-http-status-308 and mention HTTP status code 308 ?
X-BeenThere: websec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
List-Id: Web Application Security Minus Authentication and Transport <websec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/websec>, <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/websec>
List-Post: <mailto:websec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/websec>, <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2012 17:19:37 -0000
#43: HSTS: cite draft-reschke-http-status-308 and mention HTTP status code 308 ?
Comment (by julian.reschke@…):
In a perfect world yes :-) But 308 is new, experimental, not well
supported, and introduces an indirect dependency on HTTPbis.
Proposal: rephrase the normative requirement so that sending 308 instead
of 301 is *possible* (say "permanent redirect", and list 301 as example).
--
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
Reporter: | Owner: draft-ietf-websec-strict-
jeff.hodges@… | transport-sec@…
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Priority: minor | Milestone:
Component: strict- | Version:
transport-sec | Resolution:
Severity: In WG Last |
Call |
Keywords: |
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
Ticket URL: <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/websec/trac/ticket/43#comment:1>
websec <http://tools.ietf.org/websec/>
- [websec] #43: HSTS: cite draft-reschke-http-statu… websec issue tracker
- Re: [websec] #43: HSTS: cite draft-reschke-http-s… websec issue tracker
- Re: [websec] #43: HSTS: cite draft-reschke-http-s… websec issue tracker