IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [websec] DISCUSS positions on draft-ietf-websec-key-pinning

Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com> Thu, 18 September 2014 04:12 UTC

Return-Path: <ynir.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: websec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: websec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD6D41A7006; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 21:12:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JgaY35ZlhuXm; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 21:12:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wg0-x22d.google.com (mail-wg0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::22d]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 95F5D1A7003; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 21:12:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wg0-f45.google.com with SMTP id z12so246468wgg.28 for <multiple recipients>; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 21:12:20 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=Yr88ldAXAIILt4Ts8GqA3sruOGtcWCWC6+h7l45WjYw=; b=H/fHBccdyb9Ab1PzFVc42LYV7k4feE5eiVkDmFX0SP4mjPNth49ipDnj98RlgSax5P BEp/+RaeHQyADH0caySEUq3SfeFmt4fTqqBzp3Wk5R0vDSLJn52kdvCkRB+DqblPxwzQ hISkylxetSEnEG28o+GZqmuNM6o30qmghmDOju21ontpnsPSKq4iHqOx7DEt0uLk4CmJ vrW2OuHG63ZDpt1xBlR4A69bmzB0eLInFy/lQ7980/cEthnEVWk1Mcadvb4ewVegLBOn My7t6euVo42ahHR7AbDrCET8LSfpiHqrWcrQJ0PmGbFK2NoXq71hRBBz3xd5i6Z8QMSB R2yQ==
X-Received: by 10.194.161.231 with SMTP id xv7mr1891267wjb.78.1411013540119; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 21:12:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.103] (IGLD-84-228-221-198.inter.net.il. [84.228.221.198]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id h4sm1339489wib.24.2014.09.17.21.12.18 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 17 Sep 2014 21:12:19 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
From: Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <C8AB7FB1-8E0D-4EDE-8735-892FF40B6F4F@nominum.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2014 07:12:16 +0300
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <7E8E7D4E-61D0-4C6B-B5CC-FFAE1BF80699@gmail.com>
References: <CAC4RtVDiy-QbHNREsm07+iPzjDiZ1q5GjowZCBnP63nw1ezTAw@mail.gmail.com> <CAC4RtVBg6Hx5iteZ+HHz=Lk8qbRUDA00EBbOG3FQp5U4ZjgS9A@mail.gmail.com> <C8AB7FB1-8E0D-4EDE-8735-892FF40B6F4F@nominum.com>
To: Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/websec/2__nuxBPflNntA4L48CNCH9w2BE
Cc: draft-ietf-websec-key-pinning.all@tools.ietf.org, Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>, IETF WebSec WG <websec@ietf.org>, IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [websec] DISCUSS positions on draft-ietf-websec-key-pinning
X-BeenThere: websec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Web Application Security Minus Authentication and Transport <websec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/websec>, <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/websec/>
List-Post: <mailto:websec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/websec>, <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2014 04:12:24 -0000

I have heard from them. They said that they will finish the revision this week or on the weekend.

Yoav

On Sep 18, 2014, at 4:52 AM, Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com> wrote:

> On Sep 17, 2014, at 5:35 PM, Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> wrote:
>> How are we doing with this document?  Any progress on dealing with the
>> DISCUSSes and other comments?
> 
> I think I at least reached a satisfactory solution with the authors, if they agree with what I asked to do, but I haven't heard back yet.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> websec mailing list
> websec@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/websec

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email