Re: [websec] WG Last Call for -strict-transport-sec-05 - COMMENTS

=JeffH <Jeff.Hodges@KingsMountain.com> Tue, 13 March 2012 00:27 UTC

Return-Path: <Jeff.Hodges@KingsMountain.com>
X-Original-To: websec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: websec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1350721E8026 for <websec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 17:27:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -98.92
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-98.92 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.839, BAYES_40=-0.185, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, RDNS_NONE=0.1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WudoCvK8LO8a for <websec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 17:26:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from oproxy1-pub.bluehost.com (oproxy1.bluehost.com [IPv6:2605:dc00:100:2::a1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 70C5321E8011 for <websec@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 17:26:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 32675 invoked by uid 0); 13 Mar 2012 00:26:59 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO box514.bluehost.com) (74.220.219.114) by oproxy1.bluehost.com with SMTP; 13 Mar 2012 00:26:59 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kingsmountain.com; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Subject:To:MIME-Version:From:Date:Message-ID; bh=GZKBP1VrWHwzfikT/LkSpENeCAoV7u1hzTdSb0dw4/U=; b=lk8xCd+lbJTNHvrKjYBaqGzFM5ytNuK7xiofFA+c59C7OUb2M/uHKQNjvMflkR37btzMjlrZ1lTfEdp3VxG1xie4DC62jodMuQ96jcECooa3clQVTZzhn3r5uNR3iaJ/;
Received: from c-24-4-122-173.hsd1.ca.comcast.net ([24.4.122.173] helo=[192.168.11.11]) by box514.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:CAMELLIA256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from <Jeff.Hodges@KingsMountain.com>) id 1S7FZq-0007wz-82 for websec@ietf.org; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 18:26:58 -0600
Message-ID: <4F5E9451.4090807@KingsMountain.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 17:26:57 -0700
From: =JeffH <Jeff.Hodges@KingsMountain.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.27) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/3.1.19
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: IETF WebSec WG <websec@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Identified-User: {11025:box514.bluehost.com:kingsmou:kingsmountain.com} {sentby:smtp auth 24.4.122.173 authed with jeff.hodges+kingsmountain.com}
Subject: Re: [websec] WG Last Call for -strict-transport-sec-05 - COMMENTS
X-BeenThere: websec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Web Application Security Minus Authentication and Transport <websec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/websec>, <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/websec>
List-Post: <mailto:websec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/websec>, <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 00:27:00 -0000

I'd incorrectly said:
 >
 >> -- in first paragraph, is the link to informative reference
 >> [I-D.ietf-tls-ssl-version3] the best we can get, as it is a long expired
 >> I-D?
 >
 > Yes, for SSLv3, that's the canonical reference -- it never progressed further.
 > I've added an annotation to the reference.

thx to Yngve for reminding me about..

   The Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) Protocol Version 3.0
   <http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6101>

..which was (finally) published in August 2011.

I'll fix this faux pas in -07.

=JeffH