[websec] #43: HSTS: cite draft-reschke-http-status-308 and mention HTTP status code 308 ?

"websec issue tracker" <trac+websec@trac.tools.ietf.org> Mon, 30 April 2012 16:47 UTC

Return-Path: <trac+websec@trac.tools.ietf.org>
X-Original-To: websec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: websec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EF4821F87A3 for <websec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 09:47:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Jx9nQ-zARLgN for <websec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 09:47:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gamay.tools.ietf.org (gamay.tools.ietf.org [208.66.40.242]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD61921F8796 for <websec@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 09:47:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=gamay.tools.ietf.org) by gamay.tools.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from <trac+websec@trac.tools.ietf.org>) id 1SOtl7-0001qw-F4; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 12:47:33 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: "websec issue tracker" <trac+websec@trac.tools.ietf.org>
X-Trac-Version: 0.12.2
Precedence: bulk
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
X-Mailer: Trac 0.12.2, by Edgewall Software
To: draft-ietf-websec-strict-transport-sec@tools.ietf.org, jeff.hodges@kingsmountain.com
X-Trac-Project: websec
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2012 16:47:32 -0000
X-URL: http://tools.ietf.org/websec/
X-Trac-Ticket-URL: http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/websec/trac/ticket/43
Message-ID: <070.a272a1155a8eb877ff88d2ef3522188e@trac.tools.ietf.org>
X-Trac-Ticket-ID: 43
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: ::1
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: draft-ietf-websec-strict-transport-sec@tools.ietf.org, jeff.hodges@kingsmountain.com, websec@ietf.org
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: trac+websec@trac.tools.ietf.org
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on gamay.tools.ietf.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Resent-To:
Resent-Message-Id: <20120430164758.DD61921F8796@ietfa.amsl.com>
Resent-Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2012 09:47:58 -0700 (PDT)
Resent-From: trac+websec@trac.tools.ietf.org
Cc: websec@ietf.org
Subject: [websec] #43: HSTS: cite draft-reschke-http-status-308 and mention HTTP status code 308 ?
X-BeenThere: websec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
List-Id: Web Application Security Minus Authentication and Transport <websec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/websec>, <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/websec>
List-Post: <mailto:websec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/websec>, <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2012 16:47:59 -0000

#43: HSTS: cite draft-reschke-http-status-308 and mention HTTP status code 308 ?

 [ this issue is forked from
 http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/websec/trac/ticket/40 ]

 > https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/websec/current/msg01108.html
 StPeter
 <snip/>
 >
 > Section 7.2
 >
 > Does is make sense to mention that status code 308 might be
 > appropriate in certain circumstances? See draft-reschke-http-status-308.

-- 
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
 Reporter:               |      Owner:  draft-ietf-websec-strict-transport-
  jeff.hodges@…          |  sec@…
     Type:  enhancement  |     Status:  new
 Priority:  minor        |  Milestone:
Component:  strict-      |    Version:
  transport-sec          |   Keywords:
 Severity:  In WG Last   |
  Call                   |
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------

Ticket URL: <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/websec/trac/ticket/43>
websec <http://tools.ietf.org/websec/>