IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [websec] DISCUSS positions on draft-ietf-websec-key-pinning

Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com> Thu, 18 September 2014 01:53 UTC

Return-Path: <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
X-Original-To: websec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: websec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FA751A6FC3; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 18:53:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.552
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.552 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.652] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ConKsm8umYTk; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 18:53:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from shell-too.nominum.com (shell-too.nominum.com [64.89.228.229]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 557E71A6FBF; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 18:53:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from archivist.nominum.com (archivist.nominum.com [64.89.228.108]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certificate Authority - G2" (verified OK)) by shell-too.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1C9F1B85F2; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 18:52:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from webmail.nominum.com (cas-01.win.nominum.com [64.89.228.131]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mail.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certification Authority" (verified OK)) by archivist.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4F5D53E074; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 18:52:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.10.40] (71.233.43.215) by CAS-01.WIN.NOMINUM.COM (192.168.1.100) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.195.1; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 18:52:59 -0700
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
From: Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAC4RtVBg6Hx5iteZ+HHz=Lk8qbRUDA00EBbOG3FQp5U4ZjgS9A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 21:52:57 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-ID: <C8AB7FB1-8E0D-4EDE-8735-892FF40B6F4F@nominum.com>
References: <CAC4RtVDiy-QbHNREsm07+iPzjDiZ1q5GjowZCBnP63nw1ezTAw@mail.gmail.com> <CAC4RtVBg6Hx5iteZ+HHz=Lk8qbRUDA00EBbOG3FQp5U4ZjgS9A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
X-Originating-IP: [71.233.43.215]
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/websec/7hTh9X5YV2RWxOoGhCodMiynOqc
Cc: draft-ietf-websec-key-pinning.all@tools.ietf.org, IETF WebSec WG <websec@ietf.org>, IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [websec] DISCUSS positions on draft-ietf-websec-key-pinning
X-BeenThere: websec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Web Application Security Minus Authentication and Transport <websec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/websec>, <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/websec/>
List-Post: <mailto:websec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/websec>, <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2014 01:53:01 -0000

On Sep 17, 2014, at 5:35 PM, Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> wrote:
> How are we doing with this document?  Any progress on dealing with the
> DISCUSSes and other comments?

I think I at least reached a satisfactory solution with the authors, if they agree with what I asked to do, but I haven't heard back yet.

v2.14.0 | Report a Bug | By Email