Re: [websec] websec meeting in Taipei - topics?
Tobias Gondrom <tobias.gondrom@gondrom.org> Wed, 28 September 2011 23:26 UTC
Return-Path: <tobias.gondrom@gondrom.org>
X-Original-To: websec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: websec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3368311E80A0 for <websec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Sep 2011 16:26:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -96.48
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-96.48 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.297, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_HELO_EQ_D_D_D_D=1.597, HELO_DYNAMIC_IPADDR=2.426, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, HELO_MISMATCH_DE=1.448, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qv5H7ASjiQDE for <websec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Sep 2011 16:26:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lvps83-169-7-107.dedicated.hosteurope.de (www.gondrom.org [83.169.7.107]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD17711E8088 for <websec@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Sep 2011 16:26:00 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=gondrom.org; b=j2+nYEqK+h8aPiE2CXx1XJyYkCclWdS/+ynVWRm/1nUSWAHyoV+ak928AefGporG3SI0k8auMIKdfhNXHa/5lf4l2Fc7GXrsM5L5bi+H9X0Hq/CWZFxDAiUF9A1+sMXj; h=Received:Received:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:X-Priority:References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type;
Received: (qmail 30420 invoked from network); 29 Sep 2011 01:28:47 +0200
Received: from 94-194-102-93.zone8.bethere.co.uk (HELO ?192.168.1.65?) (94.194.102.93) by www.gondrom.org with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 29 Sep 2011 01:28:47 +0200
Message-ID: <4E83ADAF.3030701@gondrom.org>
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 00:28:47 +0100
From: Tobias Gondrom <tobias.gondrom@gondrom.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:6.0.2) Gecko/20110906 Thunderbird/6.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: hallam@gmail.com
X-Priority: 4 (Low)
References: <4E6FDED1.9000209@gondrom.org> <CAMm+Lwjn1u4KheHecmf8YSO+OJQYXoD7-rC6GanJOhJ+1C48+g@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAMm+Lwjn1u4KheHecmf8YSO+OJQYXoD7-rC6GanJOhJ+1C48+g@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------090208000803030403070109"
Cc: websec@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [websec] websec meeting in Taipei - topics?
X-BeenThere: websec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Web Application Security Minus Authentication and Transport <websec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/websec>, <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/websec>
List-Post: <mailto:websec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/websec>, <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2011 23:26:02 -0000
Hi, just FYI: current plans are to consider/put cert pinning on the websec agenda for Taipei, but the agenda hasn't been finalised yet and we are still working on sorting out some serious time issues for the possible presenter (as he can not attend/present on all weekdays). Sorry I can't be of more help/more precise at this point in time. I hope to be able to provide more details as soon as possible. In any case there will be remote participation tools (jabber, audio) to join in even if you are not physically in Taipei - even though the time zone differences can be a real killer depending on where you are and the time of the meeting. Kind regards, Tobias On 14/09/11 20:50, Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote: > I would like to know early if cert pinning is going to be on the > agenda as that is likely to be the reason I would decide to go to > Taipei or not. > > > I am not actually that bothered about the choice of format or syntax. > But as I posted earlier, we have four potential types of data that are > security policy related and four distinct delivery mechanisms. > > I would like us to end up with one syntax and one set of semantics > across all four delivery mechanisms. To do otherwise is to take a > ticket to hell in a handbasket. > > > On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 6:53 PM, Tobias Gondrom > <tobias.gondrom@gondrom.org <mailto:tobias.gondrom@gondrom.org>> wrote: > > Hello dear websec fellows, > > to decide on a slot and length for our meeting in November in > Taipei, this time we would like to start a bit earlier asking for > presentations, topics and ideas. > > Please send proposals and ideas for presentations to Alexey, Yoav > and/or me, if possible until Sep-25 so we can better decide on the > length of the meeting slot, but later will also be ok. Rough ideas > are fine at this stage, anything that will help us in planning the > length and scope of the meeting. > > So far we had great progress on the origin draft, entering IESG > next week. So this will most certainly be finished by then. > We could focus on HSTS and the interesting parts of "certificate > pinning" as important topics to make major progress now. > > But I want to also emphasise looking for further topics and > presentations. > Anything you would like to raise at the websec meeting, please > drop me a quick note. > > Kind regards, > > Tobias & Alexey > (chairs of websec) > > > > Tobias Gondrom > email: tobias.gondrom@gondrom.org <mailto:tobias.gondrom@gondrom.org> > mobile: +447521003005 <tel:%2B447521003005> > > _______________________________________________ > websec mailing list > websec@ietf.org <mailto:websec@ietf.org> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/websec > > > > > -- > Website: http://hallambaker.com/ >
- Re: [websec] websec meeting in Taipei - topics? Tobias Gondrom
- [websec] websec meeting in Taipei - topics? Tobias Gondrom
- Re: [websec] websec meeting in Taipei - topics? Phillip Hallam-Baker