Re: [websec] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6797 (4075)

Chris Palmer <palmer@google.com> Fri, 08 August 2014 23:44 UTC

Return-Path: <palmer@google.com>
X-Original-To: websec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: websec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C6761A0202 for <websec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Aug 2014 16:44:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.38
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.38 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wzFDFzeAA3Gp for <websec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Aug 2014 16:44:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qg0-x22b.google.com (mail-qg0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c04::22b]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D51CD1A01E2 for <websec@ietf.org>; Fri, 8 Aug 2014 16:44:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qg0-f43.google.com with SMTP id a108so6877321qge.30 for <websec@ietf.org>; Fri, 08 Aug 2014 16:44:37 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=TF5Pj9ZCq8TW2T61N5GDaavBPy3luIXoDlaLruEx65s=; b=V0Ti3Aibqwbj0JYgz6L69r6k+bS4pWkrZ0vHH5VxJ3MSfevto67lBG9Fnv9TByKE8x e00JAYu/oed8wpo7+x4SuooJHyQp/vAlHyghGKOzgMubCbu1ASZULHQC64JIApNnIqaC potBjNxVxce/3OK4pXTwDFIMqcS2jkxBcOD+gLLN1bN1iMZ+cGmQ2gAHsO8zyb6yB4F6 AG2nbC+ZDuiCGVLKWobDim8go+0KdNTDqZy/+mwANnfabU+Cc4EPiRkxSpDN2hIE6Ezp ztW4zNeN8urt0uY0MoM8LJlzKtZh+a/E9sIu07NOlc382B56lBtmj87a6tHW/c/+7aCK TwVg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=TF5Pj9ZCq8TW2T61N5GDaavBPy3luIXoDlaLruEx65s=; b=YWjfHsPCK+WofdutcjOtwzO24Edtw3Y929unuB1g4T/NG3lhpVl5Vop+bPIAHnggdk W1+oX355EJxlyuYkJp1eW8fnzdI7VM9pwIKPZW0+ql9t4ptPJk5PJ7A2soY+rSV4ga9W csIKqjjZLBp6nyVTzXaoFvtdK3GAukxhMCDRUmXUXdxfbP+kQlTsoJJVh8HgRPECp6W6 p/NNtKNFoIDL4xeo8yfBRfCkY+h1C2pIiigER0ASnZ/eIN7SoTApz30QGDe2B4Xxx1tU NSoU+I9Vk16WTJANo4mndCJMO5my9lAeN3yvq/u4MHjlSL+1n6h+3Ye6NLtYgQ+St9m9 +xzg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnrR8PjslBX1eSvOXpH5IvvKIivd3fOimEhLOcMcGzRWZiU5bA0wLnY0OYiqezVdWnK/Elt
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.140.25.11 with SMTP id 11mr28773228qgs.9.1407541476904; Fri, 08 Aug 2014 16:44:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.229.9.130 with HTTP; Fri, 8 Aug 2014 16:44:36 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <85006244-94CE-4AD8-9042-4C8CDF216C12@gmail.com>
References: <20140808190533.56A431801A4@rfc-editor.org> <CALaySJJB=g_gD9rFVoLU7JW7SkVvq9bK_H71TdPq3-em0JLFfQ@mail.gmail.com> <COL131-DS14E7BAAD30061ECA07D1D5F0EE0@phx.gbl> <CALaySJJe6v7JwceN+TucqtdJWA9dh3+oj6-awYXHJwY6iZEvzA@mail.gmail.com> <151DC1A6-B162-4EF7-A78B-3723A64F7D84@gmail.com> <COL131-DS10F844603100882CC36852F0EE0@phx.gbl> <85006244-94CE-4AD8-9042-4C8CDF216C12@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 08 Aug 2014 16:44:36 -0700
Message-ID: <CAOuvq23i1b3FwiZukJiq0wUb_UMjMC0xK5FUUSnEN1mat7U_wQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Chris Palmer <palmer@google.com>
To: Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/websec/CI-OR72Mt9kHD9fstf9uKgN-tY8
Cc: Eric Lawrence <e_lawrence@hotmail.com>, Jeff Hodges <Jeff.Hodges@paypal.com>, Pete Resnick <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com>, IETF WebSec WG <websec@ietf.org>, Collin Jackson <collin.jackson@sv.cmu.edu>, Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Subject: Re: [websec] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6797 (4075)
X-BeenThere: websec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Web Application Security Minus Authentication and Transport <websec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/websec>, <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/websec/>
List-Post: <mailto:websec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/websec>, <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Aug 2014 23:44:39 -0000

On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 3:06 PM, Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:

> For secure.tools.ietf.org, it makes sense to check tools.ietf.org and ietf.org.  That also works for .com sites. But in some countries they have their national TLS plus another for commercial/organization. So the top company/organizational domain would be something like somecorp.co.uk or someorg.org.il.  There would be no point in checking for HSTS at co.uk.  Maybe there are rules for this.

https://publicsuffix.org/