IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [websec] draft-ietf-websec-origin-02

Chris Weber <chris@lookout.net> Thu, 30 June 2011 23:30 UTC

Return-Path: <chris@lookout.net>
X-Original-To: websec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: websec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AAD211E8293 for <websec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 16:30:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.388
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.388 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.729, BAYES_00=-2.599, DNS_FROM_RFC_BOGUSMX=1.482]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1ZF5xj4ux2u5 for <websec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 16:30:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cl07.gs02.gridserver.com (cl07.gs02.gridserver.com [64.13.232.16]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2499511E818F for <websec@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 16:30:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from c-71-231-104-2.hsd1.wa.comcast.net ([71.231.104.2]:18707 helo=[192.168.1.158]) by cl07.gs02.gridserver.com with esmtpsa (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <chris@lookout.net>) id 1QcQgJ-0000Eh-IC; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 16:30:00 -0700
Message-ID: <4E0D0700.6020805@lookout.net>
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 16:30:08 -0700
From: Chris Weber <chris@lookout.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110616 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.11
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Adam Barth <ietf@adambarth.com>
References: <BANLkTik1AnXaWfPEM+PtB8ctqU_mahkWbQ@mail.gmail.com> <4E0CFA2B.7070205@lookout.net> <BANLkTikgZBSs7NZpb+o362=u+YJbEVBzkA@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTimN3tdBeX01hHaSbuBOpOK0QJ5Twg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTimN3tdBeX01hHaSbuBOpOK0QJ5Twg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Authenticated-User: 17546 chris@lookout.net
Cc: websec@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [websec] draft-ietf-websec-origin-02
X-BeenThere: websec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Web Application Security Minus Authentication and Transport <websec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/websec>, <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/websec>
List-Post: <mailto:websec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/websec>, <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 23:30:01 -0000

On 6/30/2011 3:51 PM, Adam Barth wrote:
> Actually, I misspoke.  The idna-canonicalization is a defined
> algorithm in the spec (which eventually references 10.1).  I need to
> go through and make sure all the reference point to the right things.
>
> Adam

Oh duh, I feel silly.  Editorial nit - maybe a minor change to make the 
terms (or tense) match would help.  Keeping with section 2.3's defined 
term "idna-canonicalized" then the sentence in section 4 step 5 would read:

   "Let uri-host be the idna-canonicalized form of the host component of 
the URI."

-Chris

v2.35.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status