IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [websec] DISCUSS positions on draft-ietf-websec-key-pinning

Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com> Wed, 08 October 2014 15:02 UTC

Return-Path: <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
X-Original-To: websec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: websec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 606611A1BF0; Wed, 8 Oct 2014 08:02:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.686
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.686 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.786] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id p4kJmr-HcJTt; Wed, 8 Oct 2014 08:02:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from shell-too.nominum.com (shell-too.nominum.com [64.89.228.229]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 784171A1BDE; Wed, 8 Oct 2014 08:02:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from archivist.nominum.com (archivist.nominum.com [64.89.228.108]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certificate Authority - G2" (verified OK)) by shell-too.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6291E1B81BF; Wed, 8 Oct 2014 08:02:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from webmail.nominum.com (cas-02.win.nominum.com [64.89.228.132]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mail.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certification Authority" (verified OK)) by archivist.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59CD953E072; Wed, 8 Oct 2014 08:02:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.1.10] (8.20.190.66) by CAS-02.WIN.NOMINUM.COM (192.168.1.101) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.195.1; Wed, 8 Oct 2014 08:02:30 -0700
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
From: Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
In-Reply-To: <7E8E7D4E-61D0-4C6B-B5CC-FFAE1BF80699@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2014 11:02:27 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-ID: <5BFFCA6A-F1FC-4A9D-82B2-CC5405C050BE@nominum.com>
References: <CAC4RtVDiy-QbHNREsm07+iPzjDiZ1q5GjowZCBnP63nw1ezTAw@mail.gmail.com> <CAC4RtVBg6Hx5iteZ+HHz=Lk8qbRUDA00EBbOG3FQp5U4ZjgS9A@mail.gmail.com> <C8AB7FB1-8E0D-4EDE-8735-892FF40B6F4F@nominum.com> <7E8E7D4E-61D0-4C6B-B5CC-FFAE1BF80699@gmail.com>
To: Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
X-Originating-IP: [8.20.190.66]
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/websec/JB6E8zqAgNZesrRTRnySAyzxRws
Cc: draft-ietf-websec-key-pinning.all@tools.ietf.org, Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>, IETF WebSec WG <websec@ietf.org>, IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [websec] DISCUSS positions on draft-ietf-websec-key-pinning
X-BeenThere: websec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Web Application Security Minus Authentication and Transport <websec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/websec>, <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/websec/>
List-Post: <mailto:websec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/websec>, <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2014 15:02:48 -0000

On Sep 18, 2014, at 12:12 AM, Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
> I have heard from them. They said that they will finish the revision this week or on the weekend.

That'll do.   I've cleared.   Thanks!

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email