Re: [websec] #3: Better Effective Request URI definition
"websec issue tracker" <trac+websec@trac.tools.ietf.org> Fri, 09 March 2012 21:15 UTC
Return-Path: <trac+websec@trac.tools.ietf.org>
X-Original-To: websec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: websec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2254621F85C9 for <websec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Mar 2012 13:15:29 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5CDYlKA-l8mD for <websec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Mar 2012 13:15:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gamay.tools.ietf.org (gamay.tools.ietf.org [208.66.40.242]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD16D21F8552 for <websec@ietf.org>; Fri, 9 Mar 2012 13:15:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=gamay.tools.ietf.org) by gamay.tools.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from <trac+websec@trac.tools.ietf.org>) id 1S679r-00051Q-W4; Fri, 09 Mar 2012 16:15:28 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: websec issue tracker <trac+websec@trac.tools.ietf.org>
X-Trac-Version: 0.12.2
Precedence: bulk
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
X-Mailer: Trac 0.12.2, by Edgewall Software
To: jeff.hodges@kingsmountain.com
X-Trac-Project: websec
Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2012 21:15:27 -0000
X-URL: http://tools.ietf.org/websec/
X-Trac-Ticket-URL: http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/websec/trac/ticket/3#comment:1
Message-ID: <085.f94a934223b0bf4b4188e77da0529ec4@trac.tools.ietf.org>
References: <070.63a0bf52be517dce3a5d316b05756c40@trac.tools.ietf.org>
X-Trac-Ticket-ID: 3
In-Reply-To: <070.63a0bf52be517dce3a5d316b05756c40@trac.tools.ietf.org>
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: ::1
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: jeff.hodges@kingsmountain.com, websec@ietf.org
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: trac+websec@trac.tools.ietf.org
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on gamay.tools.ietf.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Cc: websec@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [websec] #3: Better Effective Request URI definition
X-BeenThere: websec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
List-Id: Web Application Security Minus Authentication and Transport <websec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/websec>, <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/websec>
List-Post: <mailto:websec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/websec>, <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2012 21:15:29 -0000
#3: Better Effective Request URI definition
Changes (by jeff.hodges@…):
* status: new => closed
* resolution: => fixed
--
----------------------------------+---------------------
Reporter: jeff.hodges@… | Owner: =JeffH
Type: defect | Status: closed
Priority: minor | Milestone:
Component: strict-transport-sec | Version:
Severity: - | Resolution: fixed
Keywords: |
----------------------------------+---------------------
Ticket URL: <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/websec/trac/ticket/3#comment:1>
websec <http://tools.ietf.org/websec/>
- [websec] #3: Better Effective Request URI definit… websec issue tracker
- Re: [websec] #3: Better Effective Request URI def… websec issue tracker