Re: [websec] [apps-discuss] AppsDir review of draft-ietf-websec-strict-transport-sec

[=JeffH <[e-mail]>]

 >>> Section 3: Are the latter two paragraphs really necessary? I only find
 >>> such
 >>> statements useful when minimum conformance is not the same thing as full
 >>> conformance.
 >>
 >> It's apparently helpful for readers with a strong W3C-style spec background.
 >> I'll leave them in.
 >
 > It might be a good idea, then, to put something like the following in
 > at the beginning of the section:
 >
 > [[IESG Note: This section is for readers with a background in W3C
 > specification style, of which we expect many.  RFC Editor, please
 > remove this note before publication.]]
 >
 > This will avoid the same question/complaint from ADs during IESG evaluation.
 >
 > I also suggest that you move the 2119 paragraph to the end of the
 > section, to keep all three compliance-related paragraphs together.

thx, the above is done in the -09 working copy.

=JeffH