Re: [websec] [apps-discuss] AppsDir review of draft-ietf-websec-strict-transport-sec

=JeffH <Jeff.Hodges@KingsMountain.com> Mon, 04 June 2012 22:57 UTC

Return-Path: <Jeff.Hodges@KingsMountain.com>
X-Original-To: websec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: websec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8F1621F8638 for <websec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Jun 2012 15:57:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -98.784
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-98.784 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.148, BAYES_20=-0.74, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, RDNS_NONE=0.1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id G8zVpfKIqWYX for <websec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Jun 2012 15:57:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from oproxy6-pub.bluehost.com (oproxy6.bluehost.com [IPv6:2605:dc00:100:2::a6]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id E0D6221F8633 for <websec@ietf.org>; Mon, 4 Jun 2012 15:57:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 1169 invoked by uid 0); 4 Jun 2012 22:57:56 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO box514.bluehost.com) (74.220.219.114) by cpoproxy3.bluehost.com with SMTP; 4 Jun 2012 22:57:56 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kingsmountain.com; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Subject:CC:To:MIME-Version:From:Date:Message-ID; bh=vhkvePCjnsLg0H6lk5OUUQ+K0jSuzNKSWHFDbz+2zPI=; b=NlGxGk3afFXuIClWfdj+H9qu7ei97VVDQvJ/QqKAMmCbcHx7Q9MVXWCtZAfgyQnQ+bzu6tSfCtb2JISv8uhP8kPh9HkwJ8UV62FwU4vTTWouyYrCcc3VUtA4JbyyLIKg;
Received: from [24.4.122.173] (port=34158 helo=[192.168.11.11]) by box514.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:CAMELLIA256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from <Jeff.Hodges@KingsMountain.com>) id 1SbgDk-0000Es-6y; Mon, 04 Jun 2012 16:57:56 -0600
Message-ID: <4FCD3D73.6000509@KingsMountain.com>
Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2012 15:57:55 -0700
From: =JeffH <Jeff.Hodges@KingsMountain.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120430 Thunderbird/12.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Identified-User: {11025:box514.bluehost.com:kingsmou:kingsmountain.com} {sentby:smtp auth 24.4.122.173 authed with jeff.hodges+kingsmountain.com}
Cc: draft-ietf-websec-strict-transport-sec@tools.ietf.org, IETF WebSec WG <websec@ietf.org>, Apps Discuss <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [websec] [apps-discuss] AppsDir review of draft-ietf-websec-strict-transport-sec
X-BeenThere: websec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Web Application Security Minus Authentication and Transport <websec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/websec>, <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/websec>
List-Post: <mailto:websec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/websec>, <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2012 22:57:58 -0000

 >>> Section 3: Are the latter two paragraphs really necessary? I only find
 >>> such
 >>> statements useful when minimum conformance is not the same thing as full
 >>> conformance.
 >>
 >> It's apparently helpful for readers with a strong W3C-style spec background.
 >> I'll leave them in.
 >
 > It might be a good idea, then, to put something like the following in
 > at the beginning of the section:
 >
 > [[IESG Note: This section is for readers with a background in W3C
 > specification style, of which we expect many.  RFC Editor, please
 > remove this note before publication.]]
 >
 > This will avoid the same question/complaint from ADs during IESG evaluation.
 >
 > I also suggest that you move the 2119 paragraph to the end of the
 > section, to keep all three compliance-related paragraphs together.

thx, the above is done in the -09 working copy.

=JeffH