Re: [websec] Acceptance of draft-gondrom-frame-options-02.txt and draft-gondrom-x-frame-options-00.txt as WebSec WG documents

Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com> Tue, 24 April 2012 17:29 UTC

Return-Path: <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
X-Original-To: websec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: websec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADE8A21F8832 for <websec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 10:29:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.522
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.522 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.077, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Sn+UAmmCtFwi for <websec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 10:29:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rufus.isode.com (cl-125.lon-03.gb.sixxs.net [IPv6:2a00:14f0:e000:7c::2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDBB521F8830 for <websec@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 10:28:59 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1335288538; d=isode.com; s=selector; i=@isode.com; bh=amSlCBdWfHqqzbm1l7w2b30OyfoF8Od8Z4VZ8Sx6ytM=; h=From:Sender:Reply-To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:To:Cc:MIME-Version: In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description; b=dkzLNIWVqeZOS3gb89mWSywr7NScbARKWdA5DRwBnkeLGpYsuril49RLvI8rxBdFDMoiPp uWi9gYhDqvNTA+i9/KzV+s0t31EcvP2ODtBttu7csXkWvLWMW3ob5ZiGU7ccdUt1Mx/W42 cE03dcyn0ps8bvhTNwPZHp3kkZcmYq4=;
Received: from [172.16.1.29] (shiny.isode.com [62.3.217.250]) by rufus.isode.com (submission channel) via TCP with ESMTPSA id <T5bi2gAg2xJS@rufus.isode.com>; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 18:28:58 +0100
X-SMTP-Protocol-Errors: PIPELINING
Message-ID: <4F96E2E9.5050008@isode.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 18:29:13 +0100
From: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2
To: IETF WebSec WG <websec@ietf.org>
References: <4F8B39B9.3060304@isode.com>
In-Reply-To: <4F8B39B9.3060304@isode.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [websec] Acceptance of draft-gondrom-frame-options-02.txt and draft-gondrom-x-frame-options-00.txt as WebSec WG documents
X-BeenThere: websec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Web Application Security Minus Authentication and Transport <websec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/websec>, <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/websec>
List-Post: <mailto:websec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/websec>, <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 17:29:00 -0000

On 15/04/2012 22:12, Alexey Melnikov wrote:
> Dear WG participants,
> draft-gondrom-frame-options-02.txt and 
> draft-gondrom-x-frame-options-00.txt (and their earlier version) were 
> discussed in a couple of WG face-to-face meetings. I believe both of 
> the documents are in scope for the WG Charter and I think there is 
> support for working on them.
>
> As both of these documents are co-edited by Tobias, I will be judging 
> consensus on them. draft-gondrom-frame-options is targeted to become a 
> Proposed Standard, while draft-gondrom-x-frame-options will be an 
> Informational document (as it documents existing header field). So I 
> would like to start a one week acceptance call for these documents as 
> WebSec WG documents. Please send me your objections or statements of 
> support directly to me or to the mailing list before midnight GMT+1 on 
> April 23rd.
The deadline has passed and I haven't seen any objections, so these 
documents are now accepted as WebSec WG documents.Thank you,
> Alexey, as a WebSec co-chair