[websec] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7469 (4658)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Fri, 08 April 2016 06:41 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: websec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: websec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FDAD12D15C for <websec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Apr 2016 23:41:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.912
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.912 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id voybeZospETN for <websec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Apr 2016 23:41:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [IPv6:2001:1900:3001:11::31]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CC2E812D10A for <websec@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Apr 2016 23:41:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id A5FBC180013; Thu, 7 Apr 2016 23:40:58 -0700 (PDT)
To: cevans@google.com, palmer@google.com, sleevi@google.com, barryleiba@computer.org, tobias.gondrom@gondrom.org, ynir.ietf@gmail.com
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 30:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Message-Id: <20160408064058.A5FBC180013@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2016 23:40:58 -0700
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/websec/LXY-1fIwBJausbXDyNUKvniOCmA>
Cc: websec@ietf.org, block.rxckin.beats@gmail.com, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Subject: [websec] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7469 (4658)
X-BeenThere: websec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Web Application Security Minus Authentication and Transport <websec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/websec>, <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/websec/>
List-Post: <mailto:websec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/websec>, <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2016 06:41:59 -0000
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC7469, "Public Key Pinning Extension for HTTP". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=7469&eid=4658 -------------------------------------- Type: Editorial Reported by: Jxck <block.rxckin.beats@gmail.com> Section: 3. Reportin Original Text ------------- { "date-time": "2014-04-06T13:00:50Z", "hostname": "www.example.com", "port": 443, "effective-expiration-date": "2014-05-01T12:40:50Z" Corrected Text -------------- { "date-time": "2014-04-06T13:00:50Z", "hostname": "www.example.com", "port": 443, "effective-expiration-date": "2014-05-01T12:40:50Z", Notes ----- should be comma after "effective-expiration-date": "2014-05-01T12:40:50Z" in JSON at Figure 8: Pin Validation Failure Report Example Instructions: ------------- This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG) can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC7469 (draft-ietf-websec-key-pinning-21) -------------------------------------- Title : Public Key Pinning Extension for HTTP Publication Date : April 2015 Author(s) : C. Evans, C. Palmer, R. Sleevi Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Web Security Area : Applications Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [websec] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7469 (465… RFC Errata System
- [websec] [Errata Verified] RFC7469 (4658) RFC Errata System