Re: [websec] #55: Clarify that the newest pinning information takes precedence
"websec issue tracker" <trac+websec@trac.tools.ietf.org> Fri, 24 May 2013 23:41 UTC
Return-Path: <trac+websec@trac.tools.ietf.org>
X-Original-To: websec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: websec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B24BD21F8CA5 for <websec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 May 2013 16:41:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PBg6me-dYzbW for <websec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 May 2013 16:41:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from grenache.tools.ietf.org (grenache.tools.ietf.org [IPv6:2a01:3f0:1:2::30]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDA3E11E80D2 for <websec@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 May 2013 16:41:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36711 helo=grenache.tools.ietf.org ident=www-data) by grenache.tools.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <trac+websec@trac.tools.ietf.org>) id 1Ug1cB-0000uF-0Z; Sat, 25 May 2013 01:41:39 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: websec issue tracker <trac+websec@trac.tools.ietf.org>
X-Trac-Version: 0.12.3
Precedence: bulk
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
X-Mailer: Trac 0.12.3, by Edgewall Software
To: palmer@google.com
X-Trac-Project: websec
Date: Fri, 24 May 2013 23:41:38 -0000
X-URL: http://tools.ietf.org/websec/
X-Trac-Ticket-URL: http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/websec/trac/ticket/55#comment:3
Message-ID: <073.f62391cb0cf5d9ebda966c81e774dd78@trac.tools.ietf.org>
References: <058.106749b7ec8d8775c9a7c03ff71b6de4@trac.tools.ietf.org>
X-Trac-Ticket-ID: 55
In-Reply-To: <058.106749b7ec8d8775c9a7c03ff71b6de4@trac.tools.ietf.org>
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 127.0.0.1
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: palmer@google.com, websec@ietf.org
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: trac+websec@trac.tools.ietf.org
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on grenache.tools.ietf.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Cc: websec@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [websec] #55: Clarify that the newest pinning information takes precedence
X-BeenThere: websec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
List-Id: Web Application Security Minus Authentication and Transport <websec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/websec>, <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/websec>
List-Post: <mailto:websec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/websec>, <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 May 2013 23:41:49 -0000
#55: Clarify that the newest pinning information takes precedence Changes (by palmer@google.com): * status: assigned => closed * resolution: => fixed Comment: Per discussion on the list, adopted Sleevi's text but changed "evict" to "ignore". https://code.google.com/p/key-pinning- draft/source/diff?spec=svnfc4bef2ce138d467182832a362831b6d63ea9cdc&r=fc4bef2ce138d467182832a362831b6d63ea9cdc&format=side&path =/draft-ietf-websec-key-pinning.xml -- -------------------------------+-------------------------------- Reporter: palmer@google.com | Owner: palmer@google.com Type: defect | Status: closed Priority: major | Milestone: Component: key-pinning | Version: Severity: - | Resolution: fixed Keywords: | -------------------------------+-------------------------------- Ticket URL: <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/websec/trac/ticket/55#comment:3> websec <http://tools.ietf.org/websec/>
- [websec] #55: Clarify that the newest pinning inf… websec issue tracker
- Re: [websec] #55: Clarify that the newest pinning… websec issue tracker
- Re: [websec] #55: Clarify that the newest pinning… Chris Palmer
- Re: [websec] #55: Clarify that the newest pinning… websec issue tracker
- Re: [websec] #55: Clarify that the newest pinning… Tom Ritter
- Re: [websec] #55: Clarify that the newest pinning… Yoav Nir
- Re: [websec] #55: Clarify that the newest pinning… Chris Palmer
- Re: [websec] #55: Clarify that the newest pinning… Ryan Sleevi
- Re: [websec] #55: Clarify that the newest pinning… websec issue tracker