[websec] [Errata Rejected] RFC6797 (8186)

RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Mon, 02 December 2024 21:50 UTC

Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfcpa.rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: websec@ietf.org
Delivered-To: websec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from rfcpa.rfc-editor.org (unknown [167.172.21.234]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 53CB0C14EB19; Mon, 2 Dec 2024 13:50:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: by rfcpa.rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 461) id A282E1D3053; Mon, 2 Dec 2024 13:50:26 -0800 (PST)
To: joe-ietf@cursive.net, Jeff.Hodges@PayPal.com, collin.jackson@sv.cmu.edu, ietf@adambarth.com
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20241202215026.A282E1D3053@rfcpa.rfc-editor.org>
Date: Mon, 02 Dec 2024 13:50:26 -0800
Message-ID-Hash: YNEYKYSFSNUYIYGAIZDGBFXEYRKMUO43
X-Message-ID-Hash: YNEYKYSFSNUYIYGAIZDGBFXEYRKMUO43
X-MailFrom: wwwrun@rfcpa.rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-websec.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: orie@transmute.industries, iesg@ietf.org, websec@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [websec] [Errata Rejected] RFC6797 (8186)
List-Id: Web Application Security Minus Authentication and Transport <websec.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/websec/RHb3TAWR-HJIc5nFhFAsDCUt_lc>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/websec>
List-Help: <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:websec-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:websec@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:websec-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:websec-leave@ietf.org>

The following errata report has been rejected for RFC6797,
"HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)".

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid8186

--------------------------------------
Status: Rejected
Type: Editorial

Reported by: Joe Hildebrand <joe-ietf@cursive.net>
Date Reported: 2024-11-22
Rejected by: Orie Steele (IESG)

Section: 6.1

Original Text
-------------
     directive-value           = token | quoted-string

Corrected Text
--------------
     directive-value           = token / quoted-string

Notes
-----
The "directive-value" production should use a "/" for alternatives, not a "|".  See RFC 5234, which should be referenced by this spec but isn't.  This is an editorial nitpick.


 --VERIFIER NOTES-- 
RFC6797 relies on the BNF from RFC2616 which uses the "|" for alternatives,
see https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc2616#section-2.1

--------------------------------------
RFC6797 (draft-ietf-websec-strict-transport-sec-14)
--------------------------------------
Title               : HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)
Publication Date    : November 2012
Author(s)           : J. Hodges, C. Jackson, A. Barth
Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source              : Web Security
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG