[websec] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7469 (5377)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Sat, 02 June 2018 11:35 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: websec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: websec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E644127869 for <websec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 2 Jun 2018 04:35:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2dfwS3YBgj8g for <websec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 2 Jun 2018 04:35:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0677C127735 for <websec@ietf.org>; Sat, 2 Jun 2018 04:35:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 860C4B8183F; Sat, 2 Jun 2018 04:34:41 -0700 (PDT)
To: cevans@google.com, palmer@google.com, sleevi@google.com, ben@nostrum.com, aamelnikov@fastmail.fm, adam@nostrum.com, tobias.gondrom@gondrom.org, ynir.ietf@gmail.com
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 30:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: julian.reschke@gmx.de, websec@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20180602113441.860C4B8183F@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Sat, 02 Jun 2018 04:34:41 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/websec/T0e_LpZVxkGA5lgU7VVuhtZmsec>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 05 Jun 2018 02:02:43 -0700
Subject: [websec] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7469 (5377)
X-BeenThere: websec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26
Precedence: list
List-Id: Web Application Security Minus Authentication and Transport <websec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/websec>, <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/websec/>
List-Post: <mailto:websec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/websec>, <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Jun 2018 11:35:08 -0000
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC7469, "Public Key Pinning Extension for HTTP". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5377 -------------------------------------- Type: Technical Reported by: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Section: 2.3.4 Original Text ------------- 2.3.4. HTTP-Equiv <Meta> Element Attribute UAs MUST NOT heed http-equiv="Public-Key-Pins" or http-equiv="Public-Key-Pins-Report-Only" attribute settings on <meta> elements [W3C.REC-html401-19991224] in received content. Corrected Text -------------- (remove the section) Notes ----- The spec attempts to make a normative requirement on HTML consumers. It can't do that; that's the role of the HTML spec. In addition to that, this is already covered by what recent HTML specs say about http-equiv extensibility. Instructions: ------------- This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC7469 (draft-ietf-websec-key-pinning-21) -------------------------------------- Title : Public Key Pinning Extension for HTTP Publication Date : April 2015 Author(s) : C. Evans, C. Palmer, R. Sleevi Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Web Security Area : Applications Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [websec] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7469 (537… RFC Errata System