Re: [websec] Strict-Transport-Security syntax redux

[Julian Reschke <[e-mail]>]

On 2011-10-29 10:21, Adam Barth wrote:
> ...
>> What I was trying to understand whether there's something special with
>> respect to quoted-string?
>
> Quoted string is particularly bad because it's hard to know what to do
> with unbalanced quotation marks.
> ...

So your points were about quoted-string in general, not the question of 
allowing them for max-age, right?

I'm asking because due the possible presence of extension parameters, 
recipients need to deal with quoted-string anyway, no matter whether 
they are allowed for max-age.

Best regards, Julian