Re: [websec] Comments on draft-abarth-principles-of-origin-00, was: Reviews of draft-ietf-websec-origin and principles-of-origin until end of May
Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> Fri, 17 June 2011 21:50 UTC
Return-Path: <stpeter@stpeter.im>
X-Original-To: websec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: websec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC1A911E8110 for <websec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 14:50:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.47
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.47 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.129, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id U4UTUgnp8Jbd for <websec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 14:50:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from stpeter.im (mailhost.stpeter.im [207.210.219.225]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1C2E11E80EF for <websec@ietf.org>; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 14:50:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dhcp-64-101-72-207.cisco.com (dhcp-64-101-72-207.cisco.com [64.101.72.207]) (Authenticated sender: stpeter) by stpeter.im (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F0E6A400A5; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 15:50:38 -0600 (MDT)
Message-ID: <4DFBCC11.7090008@stpeter.im>
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 15:50:09 -0600
From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110414 Thunderbird/3.1.10
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Adam Barth <ietf@adambarth.com>
References: <4DF675F7.2050603@KingsMountain.com> <BANLkTike6N0qfKzsUY8VDBV4ONdyWfuZ8Q@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTike6N0qfKzsUY8VDBV4ONdyWfuZ8Q@mail.gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1
OpenPGP: url=http://www.saint-andre.com/me/stpeter.asc
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha1"; boundary="------------ms040209010808090103010401"
Cc: IETF WebSec WG <websec@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [websec] Comments on draft-abarth-principles-of-origin-00, was: Reviews of draft-ietf-websec-origin and principles-of-origin until end of May
X-BeenThere: websec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Web Application Security Minus Authentication and Transport <websec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/websec>, <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/websec>
List-Post: <mailto:websec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/websec>, <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 21:50:12 -0000
On 6/15/11 9:59 PM, Adam Barth wrote: > I was hoping other folks would weigh into the thread. In the interest > of moving forward, I'm going to combine them into one document but try > to structure the document so that folks who aren't interested in the > nuts and bolts can still get the high-level picture. Most of the > folks who want to refer to the Principles document probably also want > to refer to the Nuts-and-Bolts doc, so having them together makes that > easier. > > The main tricky thing I'm working on at the moment is the scope / > perspective issue. Once I get that hammered out (either tonight or > tomorrow), I'll upload a new draft. Thanks, Adam. Once the new version is posted I'll do a review. I think this is a normative reference from the WebSocket spec, so that might encourage more folks to provide reviews... Peter -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/
- [websec] Comments on draft-abarth-principles-of-o… =JeffH
- Re: [websec] Comments on draft-abarth-principles-… Adam Barth
- Re: [websec] Comments on draft-abarth-principles-… Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [websec] Comments on draft-abarth-principles-… Tobias Gondrom
- Re: [websec] Comments on draft-abarth-principles-… Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [websec] Comments on draft-abarth-principles-… Tobias Gondrom