IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [websec] draft-ietf-websec-key-pinning

Chris Palmer <palmer@google.com> Tue, 26 August 2014 21:04 UTC

Return-Path: <palmer@google.com>
X-Original-To: websec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: websec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26BD11A87A3 for <websec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Aug 2014 14:04:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.047
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.047 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.668, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mCrBgvfkbbH9 for <websec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Aug 2014 14:04:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qg0-x230.google.com (mail-qg0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c04::230]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 10DA61A032F for <websec@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Aug 2014 14:04:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qg0-f48.google.com with SMTP id i50so15358622qgf.21 for <websec@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Aug 2014 14:04:32 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=48siO3FRubaR2RvqOXX7XIIXLK1EBSusmkh9DAbmRLk=; b=Dn07bM6hM4gRMUbnZ82huIzq7av4mP5AM8sCDQqpo4anX2z4BshdL3EOFUEiPYzUhr eJiCJ3zDu3rtrm+dn9BtzNP56ZLMpVvhwx7OWB3W4cr9698HpmUmSTzUcZ//X8EpYTYY kRWPicB/WyyicSfjhlq1vrqmJIfPo3eHLlokY15KOGJwaz3GZJxSC2x8e7K4SLRq+WlI sZ99Lo90woBeTljQi0kBSDEVW+Cts2EKsy9PbokYNxD8FAt3gtYltP4b1mlbo2C3A5BP LcGZYBW6CabP1DkPFuCdvkGwKn7joqcbLXYSgRqge5ycM4FTixO/8LB3WImmPYRswfpi roTQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=48siO3FRubaR2RvqOXX7XIIXLK1EBSusmkh9DAbmRLk=; b=NgNkGKOJRWQfhqW+AVfhVYbZ8lNdt6Ki0iu6gvi1VVeys3Ag6qv4U2+fc4xhlVhtDE 3GQZTKbjMfk2MKjnlyo4KPYib6HlyHtvxsKs4GMpAyLQGiYajPBHWLjmD/aBt/KqCq1H n+cJCZHWCwE+QAuDAzlzUKUsujk5AjbEUZSIu+xQHzzubyQ8jKFvlzHm/0LWSR6DtN0F dnlqwmM8p9383xsqnSo3FkirhDvg3p37fhI2hAK9Q7Mtm3NFShtnXSl7y9cM//p0U7HU 5osiqFSCb7w2YJCyAgbRBGwUgxYpEl7rDg704pqs1GVfQbrNvkHSlq9SuNZW2EdvdGDq FBQQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmBQ5Aycf20zdkPuNvl2cZuX/6dJw8m7Y7LM1IARsQNbuleNgY4k1Qb1zPCea4o9qT6BkIH
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.224.114.136 with SMTP id e8mr36016689qaq.67.1409087072180; Tue, 26 Aug 2014 14:04:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.229.165.2 with HTTP; Tue, 26 Aug 2014 14:04:32 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <BAY169-DS45D73636AA204DEEABC876AEDC0@phx.gbl>
References: <BAY169-DS62B5941BF0A9024964BB0AEEE0@phx.gbl> <CACvaWvYHAmpX0f9_m-sckhWz9tcyWA-sxVR4vP-A5UcAQmnYXA@mail.gmail.com> <BAY169-DS45F1C5036AB09CA44D0BC7AEDF0@phx.gbl> <CA+cU71k-pLD315dzfd_c74QM51c7V2VQkZ26PiXUTqntmESD=A@mail.gmail.com> <CAOuvq20mZkScvPDKjsa1eZ6rdoHxf_+oF=gpaOcvkOTaYhyj6Q@mail.gmail.com> <CA+cU71mW47OvqRNTbw-H7u-F_k6hMv4xr0XcMYAS_V6eE8brwA@mail.gmail.com> <CAOuvq20C+T9Ejf_KUsfPRtUWL7ggCF0UWJZkGr5xGBEkERXeRQ@mail.gmail.com> <BAY169-DS45D73636AA204DEEABC876AEDC0@phx.gbl>
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2014 14:04:32 -0700
Message-ID: <CAOuvq20kCKk=jcXsy_d8C-4Fn-f0zshP6YUPn5N8hsKt7KO7dw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Chris Palmer <palmer@google.com>
To: Eric Lawrence <ericlaw1979@hotmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/websec/YjGftaAT97VBUFWDMDGjwL6HRFM
Cc: "draft-ietf-websec-key-pinning@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-websec-key-pinning@tools.ietf.org>, IETF WebSec WG <websec@ietf.org>, Ryan Sleevi <sleevi@google.com>
Subject: Re: [websec] draft-ietf-websec-key-pinning
X-BeenThere: websec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Web Application Security Minus Authentication and Transport <websec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/websec>, <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/websec/>
List-Post: <mailto:websec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/websec>, <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2014 21:04:34 -0000

On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 1:58 PM, Eric Lawrence <ericlaw1979@hotmail.com> wrote:

> As a site operator, I'd think of PKP-RO as a debugging aid more along the
> lines of: "If I turn this thing on, will anything break for anyone?"
>
> If PKP-RO doesn't have the same semantics as PKP, its utility for answering
> that question declines.

PKP-RO has the same semantics as PKP, at the time of Pin Validation,
which is what matters.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email