[websec] #44: terminology for referring to complete domain name (FQDN) possibly containing IDN labels
"websec issue tracker" <trac+websec@trac.tools.ietf.org> Mon, 30 April 2012 17:04 UTC
Return-Path: <trac+websec@trac.tools.ietf.org>
X-Original-To: websec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: websec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1135D21F87F5 for <websec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 10:04:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 42l7XpXNyUyo for <websec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 10:04:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gamay.tools.ietf.org (gamay.tools.ietf.org [208.66.40.242]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 720DF21F87EA for <websec@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 10:04:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=gamay.tools.ietf.org) by gamay.tools.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from <trac+websec@trac.tools.ietf.org>) id 1SOu0q-0006Cr-Ln; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 13:03:48 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: websec issue tracker <trac+websec@trac.tools.ietf.org>
X-Trac-Version: 0.12.2
Precedence: bulk
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
X-Mailer: Trac 0.12.2, by Edgewall Software
To: draft-ietf-websec-strict-transport-sec@tools.ietf.org, jeff.hodges@kingsmountain.com
X-Trac-Project: websec
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2012 17:03:48 -0000
X-URL: http://tools.ietf.org/websec/
X-Trac-Ticket-URL: http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/websec/trac/ticket/44
Message-ID: <070.91ab9f8dc677f5c51032c93d6182c32d@trac.tools.ietf.org>
X-Trac-Ticket-ID: 44
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: ::1
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: draft-ietf-websec-strict-transport-sec@tools.ietf.org, jeff.hodges@kingsmountain.com, websec@ietf.org
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: trac+websec@trac.tools.ietf.org
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on gamay.tools.ietf.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Resent-To:
Resent-Message-Id: <20120430170404.720DF21F87EA@ietfa.amsl.com>
Resent-Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2012 10:04:04 -0700
Resent-From: trac+websec@trac.tools.ietf.org
Cc: websec@ietf.org
Subject: [websec] #44: terminology for referring to complete domain name (FQDN) possibly containing IDN labels
X-BeenThere: websec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
List-Id: Web Application Security Minus Authentication and Transport <websec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/websec>, <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/websec>
List-Post: <mailto:websec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/websec>, <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2012 17:04:07 -0000
#44: terminology for referring to complete domain name (FQDN) possibly containing IDN labels [ this issue is forked from http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/websec/trac/ticket/40 ] https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/websec/current/msg01108.html StPeter > Section 9 > > The phrase "valid Unicode-encoded string-serialized domain name" seems > a bit strange, because we don't typically refer to Unicode as an > encoding scheme. See RFC 6365 regarding such terminology. -- -------------------------+------------------------------------------------- Reporter: | Owner: draft-ietf-websec-strict-transport- jeff.hodges@… | sec@… Type: defect | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Component: strict- | Version: transport-sec | Keywords: Severity: In WG Last | Call | -------------------------+------------------------------------------------- Ticket URL: <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/websec/trac/ticket/44> websec <http://tools.ietf.org/websec/>
- [websec] #44: terminology for referring to comple… websec issue tracker
- Re: [websec] #44: terminology for referring to co… websec issue tracker