Re: [websec] Acceptance of draft-gondrom-frame-options-02.txt and draft-gondrom-x-frame-options-00.txt as WebSec WG documents

Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> Mon, 16 April 2012 17:11 UTC

Return-Path: <stpeter@stpeter.im>
X-Original-To: websec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: websec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4827121F85D2 for <websec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Apr 2012 10:11:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.648
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.648 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.049, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nlRj9GwR4vAm for <websec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Apr 2012 10:11:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from stpeter.im (mailhost.stpeter.im [207.210.219.225]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BC3211E80DB for <websec@ietf.org>; Mon, 16 Apr 2012 10:11:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [64.101.72.115] (unknown [64.101.72.115]) (Authenticated sender: stpeter) by stpeter.im (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9A2834005B; Mon, 16 Apr 2012 11:25:25 -0600 (MDT)
Message-ID: <4F8C52B5.60809@stpeter.im>
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2012 11:11:17 -0600
From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120327 Thunderbird/11.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
References: <4F8B39B9.3060304@isode.com>
In-Reply-To: <4F8B39B9.3060304@isode.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: IETF WebSec WG <websec@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [websec] Acceptance of draft-gondrom-frame-options-02.txt and draft-gondrom-x-frame-options-00.txt as WebSec WG documents
X-BeenThere: websec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Web Application Security Minus Authentication and Transport <websec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/websec>, <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/websec>
List-Post: <mailto:websec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/websec>, <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2012 17:11:25 -0000

On 4/15/12 3:12 PM, Alexey Melnikov wrote:
> Dear WG participants,
> draft-gondrom-frame-options-02.txt and
> draft-gondrom-x-frame-options-00.txt (and their earlier version) were
> discussed in a couple of WG face-to-face meetings. I believe both of the
> documents are in scope for the WG Charter and I think there is support
> for working on them.
> 
> As both of these documents are co-edited by Tobias, I will be judging
> consensus on them. draft-gondrom-frame-options is targeted to become a
> Proposed Standard, while draft-gondrom-x-frame-options will be an
> Informational document (as it documents existing header field). So I
> would like to start a one week acceptance call for these documents as
> WebSec WG documents. Please send me your objections or statements of
> support directly to me or to the mailing list before midnight GMT+1 on
> April 23rd.

+1. Let's get these done.

Peter

-- 
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/