[websec] Acceptance of draft-gondrom-frame-options-02.txt and draft-gondrom-x-frame-options-00.txt as WebSec WG documents

Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com> Mon, 16 April 2012 10:54 UTC

Return-Path: <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
X-Original-To: websec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: websec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E16721F873E for <websec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Apr 2012 03:54:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.885
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.885 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.278, BAYES_00=-2.599, DATE_IN_PAST_12_24=0.992, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id m6buRnHZJa43 for <websec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Apr 2012 03:54:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rufus.isode.com (rufus.isode.com []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1741E21F872E for <websec@ietf.org>; Mon, 16 Apr 2012 03:54:38 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1334573586; d=isode.com; s=selector; i=@isode.com; bh=lBokWeLoocNog1vk4sg6ozhBJC1jJED3CJ5kL6bkMVk=; h=From:Sender:Reply-To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:To:Cc:MIME-Version: In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description; b=r4TQB9I1h9UIDoOzIZaqUEf1Q20Y4j4xFNORvWEwNCyvlvD9nIXuO8XfJfT9qEGOTFI83b LdbRtwns8L9ZaSOW+4gnym3lV5bc7RoFHTyh4RdNET6G3t7tUHgrG7nDEXSC/A8MITRtRS O1Zg6GwIbe+nNKpvblQ6tDBvQzcgmhc=;
Received: from [] (shiny.isode.com []) by rufus.isode.com (submission channel) via TCP with ESMTPSA id <T4v6EgAg20Wn@rufus.isode.com>; Mon, 16 Apr 2012 11:53:06 +0100
X-SMTP-Protocol-Errors: PIPELINING
Message-ID: <4F8B39B9.3060304@isode.com>
Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2012 22:12:25 +0100
From: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2
To: IETF WebSec WG <websec@ietf.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [websec] Acceptance of draft-gondrom-frame-options-02.txt and draft-gondrom-x-frame-options-00.txt as WebSec WG documents
X-BeenThere: websec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Web Application Security Minus Authentication and Transport <websec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/websec>, <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/websec>
List-Post: <mailto:websec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/websec>, <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2012 10:54:38 -0000

Dear WG participants,
draft-gondrom-frame-options-02.txt and 
draft-gondrom-x-frame-options-00.txt (and their earlier version) were 
discussed in a couple of WG face-to-face meetings. I believe both of the 
documents are in scope for the WG Charter and I think there is support 
for working on them.

As both of these documents are co-edited by Tobias, I will be judging 
consensus on them. draft-gondrom-frame-options is targeted to become a 
Proposed Standard, while draft-gondrom-x-frame-options will be an 
Informational document (as it documents existing header field). So I 
would like to start a one week acceptance call for these documents as 
WebSec WG documents. Please send me your objections or statements of 
support directly to me or to the mailing list before midnight GMT+1 on 
April 23rd.

Thank you,
Alexey, as a WebSec co-chair