[websec] #10: note that end-entity certs can be dristrib'd to http clients ?
"websec issue tracker" <trac+websec@trac.tools.ietf.org> Fri, 08 July 2011 23:06 UTC
Return-Path: <trac+websec@trac.tools.ietf.org>
X-Original-To: websec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: websec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3419221F8C7B for <websec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Jul 2011 16:06:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AvT8pl0DWmP4 for <websec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Jul 2011 16:06:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from zinfandel.tools.ietf.org (zinfandel.tools.ietf.org [IPv6:2001:1890:1112:1::2a]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB41121F8C71 for <websec@ietf.org>; Fri, 8 Jul 2011 16:06:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=zinfandel.tools.ietf.org) by zinfandel.tools.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from <trac+websec@trac.tools.ietf.org>) id 1QfK7v-0008Os-Gc; Fri, 08 Jul 2011 16:06:27 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: websec issue tracker <trac+websec@trac.tools.ietf.org>
X-Trac-Version: 0.11.7
Precedence: bulk
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
X-Mailer: Trac 0.11.7, by Edgewall Software
To: jeff.hodges@kingsmountain.com
X-Trac-Project: websec
Date: Fri, 08 Jul 2011 23:06:27 -0000
X-URL: http://tools.ietf.org/websec/
X-Trac-Ticket-URL: http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/websec/trac/ticket/10
Message-ID: <070.e5eb4060c3ca435f535b76c7060ada83@trac.tools.ietf.org>
X-Trac-Ticket-ID: 10
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: ::1
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: jeff.hodges@kingsmountain.com, websec@ietf.org
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: trac+websec@trac.tools.ietf.org
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on zinfandel.tools.ietf.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Cc: websec@ietf.org
Subject: [websec] #10: note that end-entity certs can be dristrib'd to http clients ?
X-BeenThere: websec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
List-Id: Web Application Security Minus Authentication and Transport <websec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/websec>, <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/websec>
List-Post: <mailto:websec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/websec>, <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Jul 2011 23:06:28 -0000
#10: note that end-entity certs can be dristrib'd to http clients ? http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/websec/current/msg00306.html Subject: Re: [websec] Decouple HSTS's two orthogonal effects? From: Adam Barth <ietf@adambarth.com> Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2011 14:35:58 -0700 To: Tom Ritter <tom@ritter.vg> Cc: websec@ietf.org <snip/> > Also Section 9 recommends distributing root CA certs to users' > browsers, and does not mention the possibly of distributing the leaf > certs instead. Less related, but I prefer to trust organizations leaf > certs individually than their root cert. I don't have a problem with also recommending leaf certs, but you should check with =JeffH. Adam -- -------------------------------------------+-------------------------------- Reporter: jeff.hodges@… | Owner: =JeffH Type: defect | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Component: strict-transport-sec | Version: Severity: Active WG Document | Keywords: -------------------------------------------+-------------------------------- Ticket URL: <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/websec/trac/ticket/10> websec <http://tools.ietf.org/websec/>
- [websec] #10: note that end-entity certs can be d… websec issue tracker
- Re: [websec] #10: note that end-entity certs can … websec issue tracker