IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [websec] WGLC feedback for X-Frame-Options

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Tue, 29 January 2013 13:20 UTC

Return-Path: <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
X-Original-To: websec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: websec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7C1821F87DF for <websec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Jan 2013 05:20:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -105.384
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-105.384 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-2.785, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pFVc9p4SyTrd for <websec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Jan 2013 05:20:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.20]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FC0A21F87D1 for <websec@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 Jan 2013 05:20:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([10.1.76.10]) by mrigmx.server.lan (mrigmx001) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0MY1FO-1UUxXM37A0-00UqNv for <websec@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 Jan 2013 14:20:32 +0100
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 29 Jan 2013 13:20:32 -0000
Received: from mail.greenbytes.de (EHLO [192.168.1.102]) [217.91.35.233] by mail.gmx.net (mp010) with SMTP; 29 Jan 2013 14:20:32 +0100
X-Authenticated: #1915285
X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/tnblG/1Ttlc0FloEdNNPHWuUg0/vUmjMGHE8qr5 y3SuyluuTNe+do
Message-ID: <5107CCA1.2070002@gmx.de>
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2013 14:20:33 +0100
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130107 Thunderbird/17.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: IETF WebSec WG <websec@ietf.org>
References: <D418C856-1FA9-4FA3-805D-6A44042B5A36@checkpoint.com> <50994817.1030503@gmx.de>
In-Reply-To: <50994817.1030503@gmx.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
Subject: Re: [websec] WGLC feedback for X-Frame-Options
X-BeenThere: websec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Web Application Security Minus Authentication and Transport <websec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/websec>, <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/websec>
List-Post: <mailto:websec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/websec>, <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2013 13:20:34 -0000

On 2012-11-06 18:25, Julian Reschke wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> here's my feedback from the HTTP/editorial point of view:
> ...

Just checking: is the WG still working on this draft? There doesn't seem 
to be any activity since October 2012...

Best regards, Julian

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email