[websec] new rev: draft-ietf-websec-strict-transport-sec-13

=JeffH <Jeff.Hodges@KingsMountain.com> Fri, 14 September 2012 23:58 UTC

Return-Path: <Jeff.Hodges@KingsMountain.com>
X-Original-To: websec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: websec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7052221F84D5 for <websec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 14 Sep 2012 16:58:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.547
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.547 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.052, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NlTIfZrvStQK for <websec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 14 Sep 2012 16:58:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from oproxy12-pub.bluehost.com (oproxy12-pub.bluehost.com []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id BA18721F84EF for <websec@ietf.org>; Fri, 14 Sep 2012 16:58:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 30938 invoked by uid 0); 14 Sep 2012 23:57:47 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO box514.bluehost.com) ( by oproxy12.bluehost.com with SMTP; 14 Sep 2012 23:57:47 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kingsmountain.com; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Subject:To:MIME-Version:From:Date:Message-ID; bh=PN9vKFTznmmBnrOSgRWjHAuK9Os/U2j3SQ1zQ6lc7PM=; b=67aWvn4vDLfBra5JU6e+1N9kL4aA85SY0WgFRrkRZp2F8QMOrUVXo856qCKNFbgooS/nxyS7yGfQYPJDoPP9gRDzk1Nyvea/QqnIOA0ND4Vl6F+Yw65LUF759KgW2C6L;
Received: from [] (port=47488 helo=[]) by box514.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:CAMELLIA256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from <Jeff.Hodges@KingsMountain.com>) id 1TCfla-0003cH-SI for websec@ietf.org; Fri, 14 Sep 2012 17:57:46 -0600
Message-ID: <5053C477.6010607@KingsMountain.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2012 16:57:43 -0700
From: =JeffH <Jeff.Hodges@KingsMountain.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120714 Thunderbird/14.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: IETF WebSec WG <websec@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Identified-User: {11025:box514.bluehost.com:kingsmou:kingsmountain.com} {sentby:smtp auth authed with jeff.hodges+kingsmountain.com}
Subject: [websec] new rev: draft-ietf-websec-strict-transport-sec-13
X-BeenThere: websec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Web Application Security Minus Authentication and Transport <websec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/websec>, <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/websec>
List-Post: <mailto:websec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/websec>, <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2012 23:58:09 -0000

New rev:

please see change log excerpt included below for details. AFAIK this is ready 
for submission to IESG and IETF-wide Last Call.

full issue ticket list for strict-transport-sec:

Redline spec diff from previous rev:

side-by-side diff from previous rev:

All issue tickets are closed.

Change Log for this rev is below.



Appendix D.  Change Log

    [RFCEditor: please remove this section upon publication as an RFC.]

    Changes are grouped by spec revision listed in reverse issuance

D.1.  For draft-ietf-websec-strict-transport-sec

       Changes from -12 to -13:

       1.  Addressed the IANA registry and IANA registry policy questions
           raised in Ben Campbel's Gen-ART LC review.  Selected "IETF
           Review" for IANA policy.  See the portion of this thread from
           this message onwards for details: <https://www.ietf.org/

       2.  Clarified the questions regarding max-age=0 interacting with
           includeSubdomains.  Expanded section 5.  HSTS Mechanism
           Overview, Added clarification text and forward ref to S 8.1
           from S 6.1.1.  Added two additional examples to S 6.2 which
           contain max-age=0.  See the thread rooted here for questions
           that informed this: <https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/

       3.  upgraded ref to draft-ietf-dane-protocol to be to RFC6698.

       Changes from -11 to -12:

       1.  Addressed various issues in Ben Campbel's Gen-ART LC review.
           See this message for details: <https://www.ietf.org/

       Changes from -10 to -11: