IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [websec] Acceptance of draft-gondrom-frame-options-02.txt and draft-gondrom-x-frame-options-00.txt as WebSec WG documents

Tobias Gondrom <tobias.gondrom@gondrom.org> Tue, 03 July 2012 21:19 UTC

Return-Path: <tobias.gondrom@gondrom.org>
X-Original-To: websec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: websec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D684D11E814B for <websec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Jul 2012 14:19:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -98.83
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-98.83 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-2.052, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_HELO_EQ_D_D_D_D=1.597, HELO_DYNAMIC_IPADDR=2.426, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, HELO_MISMATCH_DE=1.448, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ka3kUaT1imvn for <websec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Jul 2012 14:19:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lvps83-169-7-107.dedicated.hosteurope.de (www.gondrom.org [83.169.7.107]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37C5E11E811B for <websec@ietf.org>; Tue, 3 Jul 2012 14:19:57 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=gondrom.org; b=MSPnZRy5LNLiQ3gqu7R116+zHsReHH/EcH5ngwVsRnpmgaJCqv7yb0RO4xR49O00aTZG5ZMYos2DbpMNxFxw9MKPCfvTGwp7QdP7h4RrSZ8d1iZht6SXvta6mt2M1fr8; h=Received:Received:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding;
Received: (qmail 7209 invoked from network); 3 Jul 2012 23:20:02 +0200
Received: from 94-194-102-93.zone8.bethere.co.uk (HELO ?192.168.1.71?) (94.194.102.93) by www.gondrom.org with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 3 Jul 2012 23:20:02 +0200
Message-ID: <4FF36202.1050309@gondrom.org>
Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2012 22:20:02 +0100
From: Tobias Gondrom <tobias.gondrom@gondrom.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120615 Thunderbird/13.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: websec@ietf.org
References: <4F8B39B9.3060304@isode.com> <4F96E2E9.5050008@isode.com> <4F96E368.4000701@isode.com>
In-Reply-To: <4F96E368.4000701@isode.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [websec] Acceptance of draft-gondrom-frame-options-02.txt and draft-gondrom-x-frame-options-00.txt as WebSec WG documents
X-BeenThere: websec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Web Application Security Minus Authentication and Transport <websec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/websec>, <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/websec>
List-Post: <mailto:websec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/websec>, <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2012 21:20:00 -0000

<hat="individual">

Hello dear websec fellows,

please note that following the consensus of the WG for adotion of the 
drafts, David and I revised the x-frame-options draft and uploaded it as 
websec WG document: draft-ietf-websec-x-frame-options-00
http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-websec-x-frame-options-00.txt

And my apologies that this revision took so long, as I was a bit 
occupied with other drafts.

Best regards and looking forward to reviews and discussions,

Tobias


Ps.: the frame-options draft will follow shortly and looking forward to 
the discussions.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email