Re: [websec] draft-ietf-websec-mime-sniff-02
Adam Barth <ietf@adambarth.com> Sat, 05 February 2011 22:47 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf@adambarth.com>
X-Original-To: websec@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: websec@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B10F3A6A86 for <websec@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 5 Feb 2011 14:47:18 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.152
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.152 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.226, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rm39hsU+D0-4 for <websec@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 5 Feb 2011 14:47:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-yi0-f44.google.com (mail-yi0-f44.google.com [209.85.218.44]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 070BB3A69D4 for <websec@ietf.org>; Sat, 5 Feb 2011 14:47:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: by yie19 with SMTP id 19so1523280yie.31 for <websec@ietf.org>; Sat, 05 Feb 2011 14:47:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.100.163.4 with SMTP id l4mr1498588ane.208.1296946036031; Sat, 05 Feb 2011 14:47:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-iy0-f172.google.com (mail-iy0-f172.google.com [209.85.210.172]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id e24sm2978865ana.22.2011.02.05.14.47.14 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sat, 05 Feb 2011 14:47:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: by iym1 with SMTP id 1so3106835iym.31 for <websec@ietf.org>; Sat, 05 Feb 2011 14:47:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.231.17.193 with SMTP id t1mr2967944iba.89.1296946033426; Sat, 05 Feb 2011 14:47:13 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.231.35.13 with HTTP; Sat, 5 Feb 2011 14:46:43 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <op.vqgb32uw64w2qv@anne-van-kesterens-macbook-pro.local>
References: <AANLkTi=Sop4F4OBWAmBGLsr=ZN8p1xC8w19WF--YU_tA@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTik21mpStD5afYX2khKjiMmW=SPT+kz_nYM+eofF@mail.gmail.com> <op.vqgb32uw64w2qv@anne-van-kesterens-macbook-pro.local>
From: Adam Barth <ietf@adambarth.com>
Date: Sat, 05 Feb 2011 14:46:43 -0800
Message-ID: <AANLkTikO7_-RL-wgN2_UCn_dCJqBYYQf58zNtxfzR-az@mail.gmail.com>
To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: websec <websec@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [websec] draft-ietf-websec-mime-sniff-02
X-BeenThere: websec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Web Application Security Minus Authentication and Transport <websec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/websec>, <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/websec>
List-Post: <mailto:websec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/websec>, <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Feb 2011 22:47:18 -0000
On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 2:44 PM, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com> wrote: > On Sat, 05 Feb 2011 03:00:20 +0100, Adam Barth <ietf@adambarth.com> wrote: >> >> I should also say that I've added a section for fonts, but I didn't >> know what to write there. If you know something about sniffing for >> fonts, please let me know. > > I wonder if my email got caught in your spam filter, and if it did, whether > this one will too... However, I posted the details of font sniffing here: > > http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/websec/current/msg00235.html Thanks. I must have missed it somehow. Adam
- [websec] draft-ietf-websec-mime-sniff-02 Adam Barth
- Re: [websec] draft-ietf-websec-mime-sniff-02 Adam Barth
- Re: [websec] draft-ietf-websec-mime-sniff-02 Anne van Kesteren
- Re: [websec] draft-ietf-websec-mime-sniff-02 Adam Barth