IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [websec] Regarding RFC 6797

Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl> Tue, 15 May 2018 09:00 UTC

Return-Path: <annevk@annevk.nl>
X-Original-To: websec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: websec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C29512D7E6 for <websec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 May 2018 02:00:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.019
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.019 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=annevk.nl
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id r0hHmeWPGAbj for <websec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 May 2018 02:00:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from homiemail-a5.g.dreamhost.com (homie.mail.dreamhost.com [208.97.132.208]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E8F48120721 for <websec@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 May 2018 02:00:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from homiemail-a5.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a5.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 605D070406F for <websec@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 May 2018 02:00:43 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=annevk.nl; h=mime-version :in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc: content-type; s=annevk.nl; bh=qiMsr82jL57U5w/bMAipcCTSFAE=; b=ap 4QmiFq+YgO0PEn8ffk0tXlXQGQ6jgO5nfnDaJ1NCnOr7xFNFc6HAc0n9wRWzJ9LA FAHnvQHlY27mVN3284MkIRSfl2x2/0hP6mHTyd77vCHiqnMUtrDzWBpe7E9cOGt4 pziQ/IsM0OZbNPJuykhUTEYVBQi3jJtxm8fDQr9zg=
Received: from mail-wm0-f41.google.com (mail-wm0-f41.google.com [74.125.82.41]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: annevk@annevk.nl) by homiemail-a5.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3323270406E for <websec@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 May 2018 02:00:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm0-f41.google.com with SMTP id j5-v6so20045784wme.5 for <websec@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 May 2018 02:00:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Gm-Message-State: ALKqPwfq6gwPs3o9ZVMLDqKa/RpbWzJD+jG2Be97Z7pjUzxLxj7e5e6M 7pymAMBYrQ1//c7CvbimgxQEQUc5joOf3poOCQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AB8JxZofNATxFEtyOIl2Q/ZIBiVMZTFCuPsKladsnQZoLANSoevs1R5pnDqlmnMdnlExrPEkRL3KuCI4bV89MQiuyo8=
X-Received: by 2002:a50:9164:: with SMTP id f33-v6mr16850641eda.29.1526374841659; Tue, 15 May 2018 02:00:41 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.80.138.2 with HTTP; Tue, 15 May 2018 02:00:41 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <004301d3ec29$c8dc4750$5a94d5f0$@gondrom.org>
References: <CWXP265MB03125F1F074DBA2FDA1E1D2BB1860@CWXP265MB0312.GBRP265.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <960CE667-98A4-48A9-9E7E-B32E3405A961@gmail.com> <CADnb78jDEfAwoeObF62SmdaxpF2FrYF2TQZGnESE+1kZEU=xNA@mail.gmail.com> <019e01d3eb9c$955927f0$c00b77d0$@gondrom.org> <CADnb78jWAO9APYA4MMgLYcXr4DBxQoVaapNfrVm_P-QqC7j2qQ@mail.gmail.com> <004301d3ec29$c8dc4750$5a94d5f0$@gondrom.org>
From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
Date: Tue, 15 May 2018 11:00:41 +0200
X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: <CADnb78h8isBTrpNyu_nVR0b2YapQQLABvp=DXnojWx1nHjPWVw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CADnb78h8isBTrpNyu_nVR0b2YapQQLABvp=DXnojWx1nHjPWVw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Tobias Gondrom <tobias.gondrom@gondrom.org>
Cc: Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com>, Robert Linder <Robert.Vuj.Linder@outlook.com>, websec <websec@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/websec/kOLJ1gQPjLefUbkxoPeL0QEyJAs>
Subject: Re: [websec] Regarding RFC 6797
X-BeenThere: websec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Web Application Security Minus Authentication and Transport <websec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/websec>, <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/websec/>
List-Post: <mailto:websec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/websec>, <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 May 2018 09:00:46 -0000

On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 10:50 AM, Tobias Gondrom
<tobias.gondrom@gondrom.org> wrote:
> Do you think we need for this an individual RFC or would there be any simpler way we could achieve this?

You need an RFC that updates the existing RFC as there's no other
extension path provided.


-- 
https://annevankesteren.nl/

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email