Re: [websec] [apps-discuss] ABNF references (was RE: AppsDir review of draft-ietf-websec-strict-transport-sec)

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Wed, 02 May 2012 21:14 UTC

Return-Path: <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
X-Original-To: websec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: websec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1DC411E809A for <websec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 May 2012 14:14:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.01
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.01 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.411, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Sb+t+SxCp-iW for <websec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 May 2012 14:14:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net (mailout-de.gmx.net [213.165.64.23]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 18E7311E80BF for <websec@ietf.org>; Wed, 2 May 2012 14:14:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 02 May 2012 21:14:00 -0000
Received: from p5DD96838.dip.t-dialin.net (EHLO [192.168.178.36]) [93.217.104.56] by mail.gmx.net (mp031) with SMTP; 02 May 2012 23:14:00 +0200
X-Authenticated: #1915285
X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+oBb9zV3KoibnHuM+UVqLO4CuR/RiJyURWEbe/88 iqAE74xkNaoFgY
Message-ID: <4FA1A395.7090704@gmx.de>
Date: Wed, 02 May 2012 23:13:57 +0200
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@gbiv.com>
References: <9452079D1A51524AA5749AD23E003928106147@exch-mbx901.corp.cloudmark.com> <4F9EC5BD.7000404@gmx.de> <9452079D1A51524AA5749AD23E0039281075DB@exch-mbx901.corp.cloudmark.com> <4F9F9A8D.8080004@gmx.de> <9452079D1A51524AA5749AD23E003928107DBB@exch-mbx901.corp.cloudmark.com> <4FA03F4D.3050606@gmx.de> <9452079D1A51524AA5749AD23E00392810A6F1@exch-mbx901.corp.cloudmark.com> <35987DD9-06A7-4C71-90FA-8FA88427DDB8@gbiv.com>
In-Reply-To: <35987DD9-06A7-4C71-90FA-8FA88427DDB8@gbiv.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
Cc: IETF WebSec WG <websec@ietf.org>, IETF Apps Discuss <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [websec] [apps-discuss] ABNF references (was RE: AppsDir review of draft-ietf-websec-strict-transport-sec)
X-BeenThere: websec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Web Application Security Minus Authentication and Transport <websec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/websec>, <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/websec>
List-Post: <mailto:websec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/websec>, <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 May 2012 21:14:03 -0000

On 2012-05-02 21:32, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
> ...
> And if we go down the slippery slope, I would love to have a
> formal definition of set reduction, as in
>
>     ALPHA = ALPHANUM - DIGIT
> ...

+1000