Re: [websec] #40: Various editorial comments on -06

"websec issue tracker" <trac+websec@trac.tools.ietf.org> Mon, 30 April 2012 17:08 UTC

Return-Path: <trac+websec@trac.tools.ietf.org>
X-Original-To: websec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: websec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53B3921F8812 for <websec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 10:08:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vl2v8jJhUemC for <websec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 10:08:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gamay.tools.ietf.org (gamay.tools.ietf.org [208.66.40.242]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68B7721F880D for <websec@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 10:08:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=gamay.tools.ietf.org) by gamay.tools.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from <trac+websec@trac.tools.ietf.org>) id 1SOu5U-00070m-Dc; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 13:08:36 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: "websec issue tracker" <trac+websec@trac.tools.ietf.org>
X-Trac-Version: 0.12.2
Precedence: bulk
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
X-Mailer: Trac 0.12.2, by Edgewall Software
To: draft-ietf-websec-strict-transport-sec@tools.ietf.org, jeff.hodges@kingsmountain.com
X-Trac-Project: websec
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2012 17:08:36 -0000
X-URL: http://tools.ietf.org/websec/
X-Trac-Ticket-URL: http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/websec/trac/ticket/40#comment:1
Message-ID: <085.da3c7e351696b632acd3a06497d33c24@trac.tools.ietf.org>
References: <070.2b15f3c9acfbd2014856105820738ee9@trac.tools.ietf.org>
X-Trac-Ticket-ID: 40
In-Reply-To: <070.2b15f3c9acfbd2014856105820738ee9@trac.tools.ietf.org>
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: ::1
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: draft-ietf-websec-strict-transport-sec@tools.ietf.org, jeff.hodges@kingsmountain.com, websec@ietf.org
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: trac+websec@trac.tools.ietf.org
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on gamay.tools.ietf.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Resent-To:
Resent-Message-Id: <20120430170841.68B7721F880D@ietfa.amsl.com>
Resent-Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2012 10:08:41 -0700 (PDT)
Resent-From: trac+websec@trac.tools.ietf.org
Cc: websec@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [websec] #40: Various editorial comments on -06
X-BeenThere: websec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
List-Id: Web Application Security Minus Authentication and Transport <websec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/websec>, <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/websec>
List-Post: <mailto:websec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/websec>, <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2012 17:08:42 -0000

#40: Various editorial comments on -06


Comment (by jeff.hodges@…):

 forked two items to their own tickets...


 > Section 7.2
 >
 > Does is make sense to mention that status code 308 might be
 > appropriate in certain circumstances? See draft-reschke-http-status-308.

 forked to Ticket #43
 http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/websec/trac/ticket/43

 > Section 9
 >
 > The phrase "valid Unicode-encoded string-serialized domain name" seems
 > a bit strange, because we don't typically refer to Unicode as an
 > encoding scheme. See RFC 6365 regarding such terminology.

 forked to ticket #44
 http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/websec/trac/ticket/44

-- 
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
 Reporter:               |       Owner:  draft-ietf-websec-strict-
  jeff.hodges@…          |  transport-sec@…
     Type:  defect       |      Status:  new
 Priority:  minor        |   Milestone:
Component:  strict-      |     Version:
  transport-sec          |  Resolution:
 Severity:  In WG Last   |
  Call                   |
 Keywords:               |
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------

Ticket URL: <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/websec/trac/ticket/40#comment:1>
websec <http://tools.ietf.org/websec/>