Re: [websec] Meeting minutes uploaded

Yoav Nir <ynir@checkpoint.com> Thu, 15 November 2012 06:01 UTC

Return-Path: <ynir@checkpoint.com>
X-Original-To: websec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: websec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5106421F865B for <websec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Nov 2012 22:01:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.578
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.578 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.021, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xTnjDoQnXqe4 for <websec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Nov 2012 22:01:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp.checkpoint.com (smtp.checkpoint.com [194.29.34.68]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC3E621F8639 for <websec@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Nov 2012 22:01:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from IL-EX10.ad.checkpoint.com ([194.29.34.147]) by smtp.checkpoint.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id qAF61X2d003493; Thu, 15 Nov 2012 08:01:33 +0200
X-CheckPoint: {50A4822E-3-1B221DC2-1FFFF}
Received: from IL-EX10.ad.checkpoint.com ([169.254.2.194]) by IL-EX10.ad.checkpoint.com ([169.254.2.194]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.004; Thu, 15 Nov 2012 08:01:32 +0200
From: Yoav Nir <ynir@checkpoint.com>
To: Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com>
Thread-Topic: [websec] Meeting minutes uploaded
Thread-Index: AQHNwpaPngseIAMGGUm8qxwtCo6L55fp8x6AgABTRAA=
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2012 06:01:31 +0000
Message-ID: <4613980CFC78314ABFD7F85CC3027721016ED2@IL-EX10.ad.checkpoint.com>
References: <50A3E3E0.7020708@KingsMountain.com> <C68CB012D9182D408CED7B884F441D4D1E36EF3456@nambxv01a.corp.adobe.com>
In-Reply-To: <C68CB012D9182D408CED7B884F441D4D1E36EF3456@nambxv01a.corp.adobe.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [172.31.20.234]
x-kse-antivirus-interceptor-info: scan successful
x-kse-antivirus-info: Clean
x-cpdlp: 113126a6411e18f16acb2bec935a27ca3179ed97c2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <9A2734FC9DE20848A4AE939CA0864428@ad.checkpoint.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: IETF WebSec WG <websec@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [websec] Meeting minutes uploaded
X-BeenThere: websec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Web Application Security Minus Authentication and Transport <websec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/websec>, <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/websec>
List-Post: <mailto:websec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/websec>, <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2012 06:01:43 -0000

Hi Larry. 

I believe you said the W3C specs have already been changed to point to the WHAT-WG document. But I'll change the minutes to say "Nobody in the group objected to having this move to WHAT-WG, and the W3C documents can point to that document."


On Nov 15, 2012, at 3:02 AM, Larry Masinter wrote:

> Re Mime sniffing, the minutes reported:
> 
>> Nobody in the group objected
>> to having this move to WHAT-WG, and according to Larry Manister, the
>> W3C is also fine with referencing the WHAT-?WG document, so the work
>> item will be removed from our charter.
> 
> I did not say this. What I said in the meeting was that I had no objection to the working group dropping the work in the IETF.
> 
> To elaborate:
> * I think dropping the work is the logical action if none of the implementors are willing to do the work in the IETF.
> 
> * I do not speak for W3C and what the W3C is "Fine with".
> * However, I believe W3C management is concerned about insuring stable  normative references in W3C specs, but they will deal with those.
> 
> Larry
>