Re: [websec] Minor feedback on draft-ietf-websec-mime-sniff-03

Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu> Sun, 15 January 2012 20:42 UTC

Return-Path: <w@1wt.eu>
X-Original-To: websec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: websec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0ECB21F8489 for <websec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 15 Jan 2012 12:42:01 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.711
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.711 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-3.668, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_IS_SMALL6=0.556]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lIMYbXT90gP1 for <websec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 15 Jan 2012 12:42:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 1wt.eu (1wt.eu [62.212.114.60]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D14F21F8487 for <websec@ietf.org>; Sun, 15 Jan 2012 12:42:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from willy@localhost) by mail.home.local (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id q0FKfsFG007489; Sun, 15 Jan 2012 21:41:54 +0100
Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2012 21:41:54 +0100
From: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
To: Adam Barth <ietf@adambarth.com>
Message-ID: <20120115204154.GH32205@1wt.eu>
References: <20120115195120.GG32205@1wt.eu> <CAJE5ia_gBJ=7DviO5hkmqnXHtC8ptHyKAMieBrFbVV-h9rQo9g@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAJE5ia_gBJ=7DviO5hkmqnXHtC8ptHyKAMieBrFbVV-h9rQo9g@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 15 Jan 2012 19:21:26 -0800
Cc: websec@ietf.org, ian@hixie.ch
Subject: Re: [websec] Minor feedback on draft-ietf-websec-mime-sniff-03
X-BeenThere: websec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Web Application Security Minus Authentication and Transport <websec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/websec>, <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/websec>
List-Post: <mailto:websec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/websec>, <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2012 20:42:02 -0000

On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 11:52:38AM -0800, Adam Barth wrote:
> The requirement in the spec is what we intend.  The rule applies only
> to that exact octet sequence.

But then what are the impacts of not matching the correct content-type ?

Willy