Re: [websec] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-websec-strict-transport-sec-06 until April-9

SM <sm@resistor.net> Tue, 20 March 2012 15:53 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@resistor.net>
X-Original-To: websec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: websec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E42221F8602 for <websec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Mar 2012 08:53:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.629
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.629 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.030, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lWeEcv9d2w2f for <websec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Mar 2012 08:53:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B6F621F847C for <websec@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Mar 2012 08:53:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from SUBMAN.resistor.net (IDENT:sm@localhost [127.0.0.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q2KFqvV3020075; Tue, 20 Mar 2012 08:53:01 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1332258783; i=@resistor.net; bh=I9ROfrxg3s4SS7eEL3Dr8o+gmjair+TGVqnQH/rV2Z4=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=CXLq+L7WEAYWHtZfAaQ7nrYqeNKDm/lN+olyafjf3E85w3s8fVZNx5JpxM2BwnKla KbfS3+kJcuxODtTVkkVCqE9Sb12XQDzoU9XGURF0S7bBNOpZ4P7XMMbfwiwk3Tm83d ipTwcvisQ/WEl7IexGPp2pS8uaQEuyQi38PuV1LU=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=resistor.net; s=mail; t=1332258783; i=@resistor.net; bh=I9ROfrxg3s4SS7eEL3Dr8o+gmjair+TGVqnQH/rV2Z4=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=jjbdiI5bQyw5NzFqdT1RoWJUhMBNq31/TZJz4aas+qAEC/UeuiqeDGkbdjG0srmU4 Nj5ig5aOHJnY0OO4vZ7Lg6gcMpnU2Bj3arBNAFPANztaSYXF7vNFzQaM806y9qAT4m xNut9cXcVx62BfgZ/VqGayyAtvlEkWLFktQNLnkg=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20120320082723.09b07fa8@resistor.net>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2012 08:29:25 -0700
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
From: SM <sm@resistor.net>
In-Reply-To: <4F66FDF1.9090306@gmx.de>
References: <4F66623F.9000300@gondrom.org> <4F66FDF1.9090306@gmx.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Cc: websec@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [websec] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-websec-strict-transport-sec-06 until April-9
X-BeenThere: websec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Web Application Security Minus Authentication and Transport <websec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/websec>, <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/websec>
List-Post: <mailto:websec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/websec>, <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2012 15:53:10 -0000

Hi Julian,
At 02:35 19-03-2012, Julian Reschke wrote:
>I'd like to point out that I still think my concerns over the 
>inconsistent use of quoted-string 
>(<http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/websec/current/msg01044.html>) 
>  are valid and not addressed; and I think they should be before you 
>go to IETF LC.

Wasn't a similar issue raised in another WG recently?

Regards,
-sm