IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [websec] Re-litigating Key-Pinning

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@greenbytes.de> Thu, 28 August 2014 06:07 UTC

Return-Path: <julian.reschke@greenbytes.de>
X-Original-To: websec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: websec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AA851A03A4 for <websec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Aug 2014 23:07:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.219
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.219 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.668, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hij2RDSJFcm5 for <websec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Aug 2014 23:07:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.greenbytes.de (mail.greenbytes.de [217.91.35.233]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40CC21A0376 for <websec@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 Aug 2014 23:07:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.2.160] (unknown [93.217.92.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mail.greenbytes.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B826615A0BFF; Thu, 28 Aug 2014 08:06:28 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <53FEC72A.7010605@greenbytes.de>
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2014 08:07:38 +0200
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@greenbytes.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com>, "<websec@ietf.org>" <websec@ietf.org>
References: <6CAA88AE-1A98-4FF1-B994-A43A0AD3930D@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <6CAA88AE-1A98-4FF1-B994-A43A0AD3930D@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/websec/tQ74o2LbEQzKa08ExiMUByFSjqU
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 28 Aug 2014 07:35:32 -0700
Cc: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
Subject: Re: [websec] Re-litigating Key-Pinning
X-BeenThere: websec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Web Application Security Minus Authentication and Transport <websec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/websec>, <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/websec/>
List-Post: <mailto:websec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/websec>, <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2014 06:07:54 -0000

On 2014-08-27 07:44, Yoav Nir wrote:
> ...
> Fixing editorial issues like Julians’ comments about references is fine, and could even be done *after* IESG review. ...
>  ...

FWIW, I believe the ABNF issues (which are *not* editorial) absolutely 
need to be fixed as well.

Best regards, Julian

v2.27.8 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status